24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 3369  |  回复: 9
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

yaozhangwh

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 第一次投稿,两个评审意见相差很大,咋办 已有9人参与

投了篇PHYS REV E,两个月了昨天回来了评审意见
These comments suggest that the present version of the manuscript is
not suitable for publication in the Physical Review.  However, if you
feel that you can refute the criticisms, we will give further
consideration.  Please accompany any resubmittal by a summary of the
changes made and a brief response to all recommendations and
criticisms.

First Referee
The paper contains the results of the numerical
simulation with little analysis of the data. The method is fairly
standard and the results are consistent with expectations. Similar
problems have been solved by others. The new twist in this paper is
that the authors consider dielectric layers that coat the electrodes.
In my opinion, the paper does not provide sufficient new information
and insights to justify its publication in the archival literature.

How can the authors improve the paper? They could possibly ........

Second Referee
The results appear interesting to me and
obviously obtained by careful calculations. The presentation is
accessible and the figures are insightful. I estimate that the paper
can be recommended for publication in the PRE, after consideration of
a few suggestions.
大家觉得我修改的话,有希望搞定第一个评审部
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

长临河

铜虫 (正式写手)

认真修改并回答好第一个审稿人的意见,把工作的新意解释清楚,
应该可以修改通过吧?
6楼2010-04-04 14:54:00
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 10 个回答

smilerobin

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

要有足够的新意啊
2楼2010-04-04 11:37:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangbin07

荣誉版主 (知名作家)

新虫 (初入文坛)

优秀版主优秀版主

第一个审稿人不看好啊,LZ好好修改一下,可以再重投,换审稿人。
If you can't take a few risks now so early in your career you probably never will.
3楼2010-04-04 11:44:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperpublishing

铜虫 (著名写手)

好好修改,有机会
RPisalwaysinbalance
4楼2010-04-04 11:50:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 我不理解! +19 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 27/1350 2026-09-02 12:08 by Ai19911123
[基金申请] 要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够 +9 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 16/800 2026-09-02 12:07 by Ai19911123
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 10/500 2026-09-02 11:35 by 大不刘6
[基金申请] 科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题 +4 瞬息宇宙 2026-09-01 8/400 2026-09-02 10:35 by 瞬息宇宙
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +5 myrtle 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-09-02 02:42 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +6 ssyjh 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-09-01 20:01 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 面上函评意见出来了,像什么等级? 20+4 Tsingking1 2026-08-27 17/850 2026-09-01 19:51 by 超级无敌华子
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +13 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 14/700 2026-09-01 11:06 by feng6531
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +7 gdd2018 2026-08-28 12/600 2026-09-01 08:32 by 尼古拉斯小虫
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +7 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 11/550 2026-08-31 23:16 by hittle2008
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +6 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-31 21:18 by qdxxmc
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +12 eulota 2026-08-26 12/600 2026-08-31 08:42 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
信息提示
请填处理意见