24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

又个七年

木虫 (著名写手)

SEPI: 1
应助: 53 (初中生)
贵宾: 0.001
金币: 2545.8
散金: 2521
红花: 29
帖子: 1612
在线: 1459.5小时
虫号: 724679
注册: 2009-03-17
性别: GG
专业: 无机纳米化学

[交流] 文章有了结果，一个是小修，一个直接据，我该怎么办

各位虫友大侠：本人两个月前投了一篇文章到Journal of Materials Science，今天来了消息：貌似一个审稿人几乎已经接受了，第二个审稿人直接给据了，不知道这样的情况可不可以写信给编辑申请给第三个审稿人。郁闷的不得了阿，被materials letters 悲剧，改投这里又是悲剧~~咋办呢~~5555
Dear Dr. Li,

I have now received comments from the referees regarding your manuscript.  One referee's remarks are simplistic and cursory, and the second does not recommend publication.  I have also carefully studied the manuscript, and other publications in this field. Given that the second referee is a world leading expert in this field, I have decided to reject the manuscript at this stage.

I'm sorry I could not provide a more positive response.

Yours Sincerely,
Editor,
Journal of Materials Science

====

Reviewer #1: The manuscript entitled "Fabrication of flower-like MoS2 microsphere using MoO3 nanobelts as precursors" by Li et al. describes a low temperature hydrothermal synthetic route to obtain MoS2 microsphere with a flower-like morphology. Interest in synthesizing high surface area MoS2 like nanoflowers, nanotubes and other similar forms is currently the area of interest for various applications like catalysis, field-emission and hydrogen storage. It is in this aspect that the present manuscript generates great interest in reporting the synthesis of high surface area flower-like MoS2. The as-synthesized flowers have been well characterized and adequate electron microscopy has been carried out.
However the following points need to be addressed before the article is suitable to be published in J. Mater. Sci.
(1)    The following ref: F. L. Deepak, A. Mayoral, M. J. Yacaman, Appl. Phys. A. 96 (2009) 861 on the transformation of MoO3 nanobelts into MoS2 nanotubes and F. L. Deepak, A. Mayoral, M. J. Yacaman, Mat. Chem. Phys. 118 (2009) 392-397 which reports the synthesis of MoS2 nanoflowers should be included in the list of references since they are two recent papers in this field.
(2)    Page-5, Correct the Fig.1, caption, Fig 1d- TEM image
(3)    Line 45-46, page 5, No ref is included in the list for Tenne et al. Please include a couple of refs which are suitable to the discussion.
(4)    Page-6, line 30, should be "quantity" not "quality."
(5)    Page-6, line 44-45, should be Fig 3d and not Fig. 4d.
(6)    The scale in Fig. 3d is not clear.

Reviewer #2:

In general terms this work is interesting, I would see merit to its publication if a systematic series of control experiments were conducted to fully demonstrate the formation mechanism.  As it stands now, the microstructural characterization does not fully corroborate the conclusions, with regards to identification of the vesicle, and why it exists.  Furthermore, better HRTEM (and EELS) is required to confirm the statements made from figure 3d (and 4a). Finally, I really find the use of jargon (flowers and belts) to be very poor descriptors.  I would encourage the authors to continue their work, but at present more solid data is required before this manuscript should be published.

回复此楼