24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2171  |  回复: 33
当前主题已经存档。

又个七年

木虫 (著名写手)

[交流] 文章有了结果,一个是小修,一个直接据,我该怎么办

各位虫友大侠: 本人两个月前投了一篇文章到Journal of Materials Science,今天来了消息:貌似一个审稿人几乎已经接受了,第二个审稿人直接给据了,不知道这样的情况可不可以写信给编辑申请给第三个审稿人。郁闷的不得了阿,被materials letters 悲剧,改投这里又是悲剧~~咋办呢~~5555
Dear Dr. Li,

I have now received comments from the referees regarding your manuscript.  One referee's remarks are simplistic and cursory, and the second does not recommend publication.  I have also carefully studied the manuscript, and other publications in this field. Given that the second referee is a world leading expert in this field, I have decided to reject the manuscript at this stage.

I'm sorry I could not provide a more positive response.

Yours Sincerely,
Editor,
Journal of Materials Science




====


Reviewer #1: The manuscript entitled "Fabrication of flower-like MoS2 microsphere using MoO3 nanobelts as precursors" by Li et al. describes a low temperature hydrothermal synthetic route to obtain MoS2 microsphere with a flower-like morphology. Interest in synthesizing high surface area MoS2 like nanoflowers, nanotubes and other similar forms is currently the area of interest for various applications like catalysis, field-emission and hydrogen storage. It is in this aspect that the present manuscript generates great interest in reporting the synthesis of high surface area flower-like MoS2. The as-synthesized flowers have been well characterized and adequate electron microscopy has been carried out.
However the following points need to be addressed before the article is suitable to be published in J. Mater. Sci.
(1)     The following ref: F. L. Deepak, A. Mayoral, M. J. Yacaman, Appl. Phys. A. 96 (2009) 861 on the transformation of MoO3 nanobelts into MoS2 nanotubes and F. L. Deepak, A. Mayoral, M. J. Yacaman, Mat. Chem. Phys. 118 (2009) 392-397 which reports the synthesis of MoS2 nanoflowers should be included in the list of references since they are two recent papers in this field.
(2)     Page-5, Correct the Fig.1, caption, Fig 1d- TEM image
(3)     Line 45-46, page 5, No ref is included in the list for Tenne et al. Please include a couple of refs which are suitable to the discussion.
(4)     Page-6, line 30, should be "quantity" not "quality."
(5)     Page-6, line 44-45, should be Fig 3d and not Fig. 4d.
(6)     The scale in Fig. 3d is not clear.

Reviewer #2:

In general terms this work is interesting, I would see merit to its publication if a systematic series of control experiments were conducted to fully demonstrate the formation mechanism.  As it stands now, the microstructural characterization does not fully corroborate the conclusions, with regards to identification of the vesicle, and why it exists.  Furthermore, better HRTEM (and EELS) is required to confirm the statements made from figure 3d (and 4a). Finally, I really find the use of jargon (flowers and belts) to be very poor descriptors.  I would encourage the authors to continue their work, but at present more solid data is required before this manuscript should be published.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

julie1109

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
个人感觉申诉的希望不大!
编辑比较看着第二个人的意见。
2楼2010-03-29 18:41:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wanghc1988

新虫 (小有名气)

改投吧
3楼2010-03-29 18:46:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yyqin05

金虫 (初入文坛)

个人建议改投……
静静的,水仙花开了~~~
4楼2010-03-29 19:03:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hqsinberg

木虫 (著名写手)

清风小木虫


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
现在的审稿人倾向于听取最不利的意见,据我所知,4个审稿人,三个统一受,一个巨,最终编辑还是据
5楼2010-03-29 19:11:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

IEEE杂志与会议专家


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
" I have also carefully studied the manuscript, and other publications in this field. Given that the second referee is a world leading expert in this field, I have decided to reject the manuscript at this stage."

编辑这么说了,改投吧,除非你有新内容加进去。
6楼2010-03-29 19:11:41
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

weiswallow

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

修改在改投吧!
学无止境
7楼2010-03-29 19:18:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

qzhaosdu

金虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
换个杂志看看吧
Anewday,anewhour,anewminute,anewpeople.
8楼2010-03-29 19:35:35
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

snow901425

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
编辑说第二个审稿人是大牛
加数据或者改投吧
9楼2010-03-29 19:42:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

fantasi

木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
要煽情感动编辑
我的一篇被拒,修改重投,现在给了修改机会
10楼2010-03-29 19:59:22
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 又个七年 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 什么时候开奖? +4 CrisMessi 2026-08-18 4/200 2026-08-19 00:53 by gatelove
[基金申请] 咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否 +7 启萌科技 2026-08-12 27/1350 2026-08-18 21:44 by Noways
[教师之家] 为什么余额宝的年化利率越来越低?主要原因有哪些? +3 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-15 3/150 2026-08-18 21:40 by xiaohuixin
[基金申请] 2027广东省杰青 +3 奶牛小黑 2026-08-15 9/450 2026-08-18 20:09 by 奶牛小黑
[基金申请] 朋友圈看到的 +4 wangzilk 2026-08-18 5/250 2026-08-18 19:25 by wangzilk
[基金申请] 欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律 +51 医学老男孩 2026-08-13 110/5500 2026-08-18 19:07 by icerianxia
[基金申请] 明天放榜? +5 Shxjjxjkx 2026-08-18 5/250 2026-08-18 18:14 by -大大大大大-
[基金申请] 时间戳变了,能看出什么问题? +8 基诺咪客 2026-08-17 11/550 2026-08-18 17:13 by 悠然熊猫
[论文投稿] 投稿咨询 +4 wwm09 2026-08-17 6/300 2026-08-18 15:36 by wwm09
[基金申请] 时间戳又变了8-15 +14 archvillain 2026-08-15 26/1300 2026-08-18 13:37 by phantomgost
[基金申请] 今天维护系统维护 祝所有人 高中 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-18 9/450 2026-08-18 13:01 by 家与远方
[基金申请] 哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜? +13 Ldrop2023 2026-08-13 16/800 2026-08-18 12:25 by 淀粉搬运工
[基金申请] 快农历七夕节了,轻松一下,男人悄悄话,女施主请不要进来。 +4 Tide man 2026-08-14 5/250 2026-08-18 11:35 by Tide man
[基金申请] 感觉是下周放榜了 +6 angus9576 2026-08-17 11/550 2026-08-17 23:57 by angus9576
[基金申请] filecode=后面第一个是大写字母 +8 wangze12014 2026-08-14 10/500 2026-08-17 17:05 by xter9665
[基金申请] 今天系统多次维护,明天很可能放榜! +8 zju2000 2026-08-16 9/450 2026-08-17 12:20 by lmz0216
[精细化工] 招聘 金属平磨液,抛光液研发工程师 +3 小天0311 2026-08-14 3/150 2026-08-16 07:31 by H9PLUS
[基金申请] 各位道友,我要去昆明玩几天,回来见。 +7 Tide man 2026-08-14 8/400 2026-08-15 01:11 by arzu_hma
[基金申请] 重要来源:本周末出结果 +10 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-12 10/500 2026-08-13 15:46 by likettle
[基金申请] 不应该看fileCode +7 且听虎啸 2026-08-12 9/450 2026-08-13 14:27 by flydreamws
信息提示
请填处理意见