24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

210jiejie

金虫 (正式写手)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 679.9
散金: 124
红花: 1
帖子: 502
在线: 44.4小时
虫号: 493102
注册: 2008-01-09
性别: GG
专业: 电化学

[交流] 怎么挽救被拒文章，战胜学霸的刁难？已有1人参与

各位虫友，
      大家好！
   自去年11月底我投了一篇自己的很满意的文章，创新点很强，是关于电子废弃物的回收处理的文章。修改好后投到了Environmental Science & Technology ，1月余后被拒，3个审稿人的意见：
Reviewer1： Most contents in this manuscript has been reported in the published paper by the same authors.
Rate the overall importance：3
Rate the originality/novelty：4
Rate the technical quality：4
Rate the clarity：5
  Reviewer 2：Dear authors, you have make a great work with this paper but I think the last reference of the manuscript (other of your papers) shows the same information that you try to publish in this journal. For this reason I must to ask the editor to reject the paper.
Rate the overall importance: 8
Rate the originality/novelty: 9
Rate the technical quality: 8
Rate the clarity: 8

Reviewer: 3
Dear Authour's,
The manusript is quite interesting becuase the problem which you have addressed is one of the most important environmental problem. I appreciate your efforts for one step separation method to get the valuable material  from the WPCB's. The results of GC-MS and FTIR are well described and correlated in a systematic manner. So, I recommend that the paper may be accepted without any revision.
Rate the overall importance：9
Rate the originality/novelty：10
Rate the technical quality：9
Rate the clarity：10

结果，编辑拒稿。大家看第一个人是不是很没有礼貌？是不是有失公正的评价我们的研究工作？其实我们在投这篇论文之前是发表了一篇在hazardous materials上面，但是不像审稿人1和2所说的有些类似的东西，而是对上一个工作有突破性的进展。
于是，我又投了hazardous materials，又被拒。请看审稿意见：
Reviewer #1: Using vacuum pyrolysis-centrifugation coupling technology to recycle organic materials and solder from waste printed circuit boards was a novel method, so the manuscript should be published. But the contents should be concise, especially for page 6 and 8. For example, the sentence, "What is the reason for this phenomenon?" at page 6, should be deleted. The contents of page 8 repeated the table 3.

Reviewer #2: This paper attempts to describe the performance of a coupled vacuum pyrolysis centrifugation (VPC) system to recover materials from waste printed circuit board.
This paper is not currently suited for publication.........
我敢肯定，这个第二个审稿人是中国人，包括前一次审稿的家伙，应该是同一个人，是我们这个领域以前发文章发的较多的那个人，对我们进行强制打压，后面提的问题无中生有，说了上千字，不知所云。。。。
大家帮忙评评理，真的难以接受，有的中国人为什么心胸狭窄，，，请大家帮忙建议怎么写申诉意见，请大家提供模板，谢谢了。。。。

回复此楼