24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

snailove

铁杆木虫 (正式写手)

应助: 15 (小学生)
金币: 8339
散金: 466
红花: 6
帖子: 512
在线: 628.3小时
虫号: 517731
注册: 2008-03-04
专业: 高分子合成化学

[交流] Macromolecules被拒，是否可补全数据再投？

2月8号投ma，昨天回来结果。一个审稿人拒，一个审稿人说小修。
想请教下，将第一个审稿人说的不足的地方补一下，把数据表证得漂亮点，该改的地方改一下，是否可以再投ma?
2个审稿人的意见如下：
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:
> Reviewer: 1
>
> Recommendation: Publish as is, or with minor revisions as
> noted.
>
> Comments:
> The paper is generally interesting.  I do not have any
> serious issues.  It should be published with minor
> changes.  Some typographical errors need to be
> corrected.  For example, on page 6 (line 48)
> ‘leaving’ needs to be changed to ‘living’.
> Other queries are as follows:
> 1) In section… “Synthesis of
> starch-based xanthate agent – Authors state that the
> “reaction mixture was allowed to react for 24
> hrs.”  It is not clear if that was at 100C or at room
> temperature?
> It is not clear how the films were prepared for the contact
> angle.  Were they conditioned at ASTM conditions or
> were they bone dry?  The contact angle will certainly
> be dependent on the condition of the films.
>
>
> Additional Questions:
> Do these findings represent a significant advance in the
> polymer field?: Yes
>
> Please rate the overall quality and clarity of the
> manuscript: Good
>
> Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes
>

> Reviewer: 2
>
> Recommendation: Do not publish.
> Comments:
> The manuscript by Lu et al on the synthesis of starch
> derivatives is potentially very interesting. However, I feel
> that it has too many analytical gaps to be suitable for
> synthesis in Macromolecules.
> The weak point of the manuscript is the analysis of the
> polymer prepared.
> The authors only showed the increase of the molecular
> weight in Figure 4, but this is not sufficient to prove the
> livingness of the system. The high PDIs suggest already that
> the polymerization is not perfect. The GPC curves should be
> displayed to show the shape (and potential formation of high
> molecular weight products). In addition, it is common
> procedure to cleave the arms from the backbone to confirm
> that the molecular weight of the arm is close to the
> theoretical value.
> Other comments:
> Scheme 1: The authors should consider that two products are
> formed when adding on to the double bond. I don’t think it
> has an effect on the polymerization though.
> Figure 2: There is a CH2 group missing in the structure of
> the NMR shown. The missing group is also not assigned
> I recommend showing the NMR of the hydrolyzed product to
> confirm that all the groups have been hydrolyzed. FT-IR
> analysis is only complementary
> Unfortunately, I cannot recommend publication this time,
> but I recommend the authors to spend more time on further
> investigations. This could be potentially nice work

  第二个审稿人最后一句话是否可以理解为如果再补全数据，把数据做更漂亮可以再投ma试试？

  希望有经验的虫友给些建议，万分感谢。
PS: 编辑的意见是拒绝.编辑采纳了第二个审稿人的意见.

[ Last edited by snailove on 2010-3-16 at 23:09 ]

回复此楼