| 查看: 3054 | 回复: 12 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
【讨论】大牛Peter Clark主动从Nature Geoscience撤稿 已有9人参与
|
|||
|
来源链接 http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journ ... t/full/ngeo780.html Retraction: Constraints on future sea-level rise from past sea-level change Mark Siddall, Thomas F. Stocker & Peter U. Clark Introduction Nature Geoscience 2, 571–575 (2009); published online: 26 July 2009; retracted online: 21 February 2010. This Letter presented projections of future sea-level rise based on simulations of the past 22,000 years of sea-level history using a simple, empirical model linking sea-level rise to global mean-temperature anomalies. One of the main conclusions of the Letter was that the model results supported the projections of sea-level rise during the twenty-first century that are reported in the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Unfortunately, we have since found that our projections were affected by two oversights in our model approach. First, we tested the sensitivity of our results to the length of the time step used in the integration of the model for the period of deglaciation, which we found to be robust. However, we overlooked that the simulations of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries are sensitive to this time step, which led to an overestimation of the sea-level response to warming in the simulations for these centuries. Second, we did not include the effect of the uncertainty in the temperature reconstructions since the Medieval Climate Anomaly in our uncertainty estimates for the twenty-first-century projections. This led to an inconsistency between the twentieth-century simulation used to test the predictive capability of the model and the twenty-first-century simulation, owing to a provisional allowance for warming since the Little Ice Age in the twentieth-century simulations. Thus we no longer have confidence in our projections for the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, and for this reason the authors retract the results pertaining to sea-level rise after 1900. Both our simulations of the last deglaciation, and the result that the equilibrium response of sea-level change to temperature is non-linear over the last deglaciation, are robust to the length of the time step used, and are still valid. We thank S. Rahmstorf and M. Vermeer for bringing these issues to our attention. 牛人的气度不仅仅在于对自己成果的信心上，更体现在对他人批评虚怀若谷上。 看看我们身边的人，也观照一下自己，有这个勇气么？ [ Last edited by risewithsu on 2010-2-22 at 20:06 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
关于会评
已经有1人回复
-
据说！出现这些情况，国基金会评本子会被拿下！
已经有19人回复
-
地球化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有277人回复
-
无人打捞，直接陪跑
已经有16人回复
-
青C最后一年，散金祈福吧
已经有48人回复
-
定了定了，明天出结果！2025 国自然基金结果即将揭晓，查询攻略看这里
已经有107人回复
-
2025国家自然科学基金放榜时间，根据官方回应，8月15日基本没戏了
已经有5人回复
-
没中，有点难受，科研也许就到这了，回归生活吧
已经有15人回复
-
各位未来院士帮忙看看评审意见
已经有9人回复
-
【招聘】科研助理+五险一金
已经有19人回复
-
《风吹过日常的缝隙》
已经有0人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 讨论一下超电的大牛吧！
已经有22人回复
- 稿子没撤了...
已经有10人回复
- 电机与控制学报撤稿怎么办
已经有10人回复
- 投过nature的大牛请进
已经有8人回复