| 查看: 3223 | 回复: 12 | |||
[交流]
【讨论】大牛Peter Clark主动从Nature Geoscience撤稿 已有9人参与
|
|
来源链接 http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journ ... t/full/ngeo780.html Retraction: Constraints on future sea-level rise from past sea-level change Mark Siddall, Thomas F. Stocker & Peter U. Clark Introduction Nature Geoscience 2, 571–575 (2009); published online: 26 July 2009; retracted online: 21 February 2010. This Letter presented projections of future sea-level rise based on simulations of the past 22,000 years of sea-level history using a simple, empirical model linking sea-level rise to global mean-temperature anomalies. One of the main conclusions of the Letter was that the model results supported the projections of sea-level rise during the twenty-first century that are reported in the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Unfortunately, we have since found that our projections were affected by two oversights in our model approach. First, we tested the sensitivity of our results to the length of the time step used in the integration of the model for the period of deglaciation, which we found to be robust. However, we overlooked that the simulations of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries are sensitive to this time step, which led to an overestimation of the sea-level response to warming in the simulations for these centuries. Second, we did not include the effect of the uncertainty in the temperature reconstructions since the Medieval Climate Anomaly in our uncertainty estimates for the twenty-first-century projections. This led to an inconsistency between the twentieth-century simulation used to test the predictive capability of the model and the twenty-first-century simulation, owing to a provisional allowance for warming since the Little Ice Age in the twentieth-century simulations. Thus we no longer have confidence in our projections for the twentieth and twenty-first centuries, and for this reason the authors retract the results pertaining to sea-level rise after 1900. Both our simulations of the last deglaciation, and the result that the equilibrium response of sea-level change to temperature is non-linear over the last deglaciation, are robust to the length of the time step used, and are still valid. We thank S. Rahmstorf and M. Vermeer for bringing these issues to our attention. 牛人的气度不仅仅在于对自己成果的信心上，更体现在对他人批评虚怀若谷上。 看看我们身边的人，也观照一下自己，有这个勇气么？ [ Last edited by risewithsu on 2010-2-22 at 20:06 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
355 B区地质调剂
已经有1人回复
-
解锁青少年负责任决策的关键：基于PISA 2022全球数据的SEL维度研究成果发表
已经有1人回复
-
地质学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有61人回复
-
招聘博士研究生
已经有45人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 讨论一下超电的大牛吧！
已经有22人回复
- 稿子没撤了...
已经有10人回复
- 电机与控制学报撤稿怎么办
已经有10人回复
- 投过nature的大牛请进
已经有8人回复
2楼2010-02-22 20:18:27
3楼2010-02-22 23:04:09
calanus
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3350.9
- 帖子: 1700
- 在线: 164小时
- 虫号: 414503
- 注册: 2007-06-27
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 生物海洋学与海洋生物资源
4楼2010-02-22 23:17:10
5楼2010-04-20 15:20:04
ldlihongwei
铜虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 217.1
- 散金: 1
- 帖子: 25
- 在线: 5.1小时
- 虫号: 915031
- 注册: 2009-11-28
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 第四纪地质 自然地理
6楼2010-05-13 20:45:00
7楼2010-05-14 20:20:18
8楼2010-05-14 22:15:32
xyzhchina
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1703.5
- 散金: 500
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 304
- 在线: 36.7小时
- 虫号: 579530
- 注册: 2008-07-11
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 矿床地球化学和有机地球化
9楼2010-05-15 00:03:10
cqg1985
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
寂静寒武
- 应助: 11 (小学生)
- 贵宾: 0.224
- 金币: 22789.9
- 散金: 1000
- 红花: 15
- 帖子: 2272
- 在线: 193.9小时
- 虫号: 708785
- 注册: 2009-02-25
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 地层学
10楼2010-05-15 09:52:01
