24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 1122  |  回复: 9
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

HMSMIT

木虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 【求助】Acta Biomaterialia 要求major revise

09年11月投的稿,今天返回意见,要求major revise. 三个审稿人提了很多意见,批的很厉害,信心有点受挫,不知道修改后接受的几率有多大?望有经验虫子指点一二,传授点经验,谢谢!
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

HMSMIT

木虫 (初入文坛)

非常感谢大家的热心回帖,下面是editor的信:

Dear Mr. XXX,

The above manuscript has now been reviewed. The referees have raised some important points that require your attention. I am enclosing below the relevant editorial comments. I apologize for the unusual delay, as we waited for an overdue reviewer.

I would be very grateful if you would prepare a revised version of the paper according to the following instructions.  

Your revision should include a separate file entitled your 'Response to Reviewers', which should contain a list of the changes that you have made in your manuscript, and should indicate how these relate to each referee request. Please highlight the corresponding changes in the text of your manuscript. The text and tables for your manuscript should be a Word or LaTex file (NOT a PDF).

Please submit the revised paper by Mar  1 2010 12:00:00:000AM by going to http://ees.elsevier.com/actbio/ and logging in as an Author:
Your username is: XXX

If you need to retrieve password details, please go to:
http://ees.elsevier.com/actbio/automail_query.asp

You will find your submission record in the "Submissions Needing Revision" menu.

Please also see instructions from the publishers: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find ... /authorinstructions
Please refer to these when preparing your revised version.

I look forward to receiving the revised version as soon as possible, so that the paper can be considered further.

Yours sincerely,

William R. Wagner, Ph.D.
Editor-in-Chief
Acta Biomaterialia

editor倒是没什么意见,但是3个审稿人问了超多问题,看的人都想崩溃。而且3月1号就是due, 就一个月的时间,所以基本不可能补实验,还有些问题是无法避免的,也不好回答。我同学跟我说,如果修改后,他们不让发表,就写信给editor,和他argue,我同学曾经成功过。不知道可行否。

再次感谢大家:)
引用回帖:
Originally posted by qingbo62 at 2010-01-27 10:09:06:
可以把editor的信发上来看看,主要看editor是什么态度。

不过,从我投过的文章来看,凡是要求大改的,从来没有被拒过,而且都只改过一次,所以应该是非常有希望的。
楼上几个人说的都很有道理: 态度要认真,尽 ...

8楼2010-01-27 22:49:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 10 个回答

luyaozju

金虫 (小有名气)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
修改好就行啊 总比直接拒的好吧
2楼2010-01-26 08:33:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wgcui

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
修,说明对你的文章新意没有否决。有希望的,看你修得如何了。
3楼2010-01-26 08:43:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangwj

荣誉版主 (职业作家)

小木虫无限续航核潜艇


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
只要没有被拒,point to point 的回答,客气一点。应该是没有问题的。祝你虎年好运!
谢谢支持材料区@小木虫论坛
4楼2010-01-26 11:29:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见