| 查看: 823 | 回复: 6 | ||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
wolfzhong木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
一篇JPC文章审稿人的意见
|
|
|
???????????????? ?????????????????????С??2????? ??????????????????? Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: This paper is not recommended because the material is not appropriate for the Journal of Physical Chemistry. Comments: In this work the authors present a very thorough survey of the energies and structures of possible di- and tri-nuclear Cr-carbonyl complexes using standard DFT methods. The technical execution is in good order and the presentation is also solidly done. I am puzzled, however, why this material is being sent to J. of Phys. Chem. - I can't really see a lot of physical chemists enjoying this material. It seems to me that this work should be more interesting to the organometallic community.Organometallics or the J. of Organometallic Chem. would be a much better forum for this work. I also urge the authors to consider rewriting the paper to make it a little more exciting. In the current form, each structure and its energy is being presented in a very linear fashion. I do see the value of having such an analysis of the different bonding and structure patterns for some researchers, but I doubt that this work will be able to excite anyone in its current form. This looks like a very mundane and standard application of DFT that anyone with a laptop can do within a week. ???????????????????????? We have now received two reviews of your manuscript, which you will find below. As you will see, one reviewer indicates that only minor revisions are needed, while the other recommends against publication. Both reviewers suggest revisions be made to your manuscript. The primary criticism of reviewer 2 is a lack of physical insights gleaned from the studies. The criteria for publication of computational papers are that they must satisfy at least one of the following criteria: - provide significant new physical insight into an experimentally relevant system or process - present a new theoretical or computational methodology of general interest Based on this, I cannot accept the manuscript in its present form, but if you believe it can be revised to address reviewer 2â?™s concerns, I would consider the revised form of the manuscript. ???????????????? 1.????????????JPC??????JPC?????????????????????????????????????л????????????????????????????????????????????? 2. ??????????????????????????????????????Щ???鰡 3. ????????????????????????????2??????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????ok??? ??δ????????????????????????Щ???лл?? |
回复此楼
pepperp
至尊木虫 (文坛精英)
- 应助: 40 (小学生)
- 金币: 45549.5
- 散金: 120
- 红花: 4
- 帖子: 35287
- 在线: 902.5小时
- 虫号: 72931
- 注册: 2005-06-06
- 专业: 生物材料
7楼2010-01-09 16:51:55
2楼2010-01-09 13:27:23
3楼2010-01-09 13:31:26
wolfzhong
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 23 (小学生)
- 金币: 3429.5
- 散金: 274
- 红花: 9
- 帖子: 986
- 在线: 751.4小时
- 虫号: 619989
- 注册: 2008-10-08
- 专业: 理论和计算化学
4楼2010-01-09 14:07:53
