| 查看: 811 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
wolfzhong木虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
一篇JPC文章审稿人的意见
|
||
|
???????????????? ?????????????????????С??2????? ??????????????????? Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: This paper is not recommended because the material is not appropriate for the Journal of Physical Chemistry. Comments: In this work the authors present a very thorough survey of the energies and structures of possible di- and tri-nuclear Cr-carbonyl complexes using standard DFT methods. The technical execution is in good order and the presentation is also solidly done. I am puzzled, however, why this material is being sent to J. of Phys. Chem. - I can't really see a lot of physical chemists enjoying this material. It seems to me that this work should be more interesting to the organometallic community.Organometallics or the J. of Organometallic Chem. would be a much better forum for this work. I also urge the authors to consider rewriting the paper to make it a little more exciting. In the current form, each structure and its energy is being presented in a very linear fashion. I do see the value of having such an analysis of the different bonding and structure patterns for some researchers, but I doubt that this work will be able to excite anyone in its current form. This looks like a very mundane and standard application of DFT that anyone with a laptop can do within a week. ???????????????????????? We have now received two reviews of your manuscript, which you will find below. As you will see, one reviewer indicates that only minor revisions are needed, while the other recommends against publication. Both reviewers suggest revisions be made to your manuscript. The primary criticism of reviewer 2 is a lack of physical insights gleaned from the studies. The criteria for publication of computational papers are that they must satisfy at least one of the following criteria: - provide significant new physical insight into an experimentally relevant system or process - present a new theoretical or computational methodology of general interest Based on this, I cannot accept the manuscript in its present form, but if you believe it can be revised to address reviewer 2â?™s concerns, I would consider the revised form of the manuscript. ???????????????? 1.????????????JPC??????JPC?????????????????????????????????????л????????????????????????????????????????????? 2. ??????????????????????????????????????Щ???鰡 3. ????????????????????????????2??????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????ok??? ??δ????????????????????????Щ???лл?? |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
283求调剂
已经有20人回复
-
求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
材料工程302分求调剂
已经有17人回复
-
一志愿华中农微生物，288分，三年实验经历
已经有10人回复
-
化学工程与技术324调剂
已经有22人回复
-
273求调剂
已经有51人回复
-
材料复试求调剂
已经有18人回复
-
一志愿211，化学学硕，310分，本科重点双非，求调剂
已经有24人回复
-
调剂
已经有9人回复
-
生物学调剂 可调剂到生物与医药
已经有6人回复
3楼2010-01-09 13:31:26
2楼2010-01-09 13:27:23
wolfzhong
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 23 (小学生)
- 金币: 3429.5
- 散金: 274
- 红花: 9
- 帖子: 986
- 在线: 751.4小时
- 虫号: 619989
- 注册: 2008-10-08
- 专业: 理论和计算化学
4楼2010-01-09 14:07:53
jing15209791
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1402.9
- 散金: 341
- 帖子: 832
- 在线: 131.1小时
- 虫号: 543960
- 注册: 2008-04-11
- 专业: 电化学分析
5楼2010-01-09 14:08:39
