24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1622  |  回复: 9
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

tbs01

银虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 文章没新意怎么办?(两拒之后)

开始投了J.Controlled.Release,拒了,说没新意。
再投JPCC,审了一个月,又拒了,一个专家说小修后接受;
另一个极力反对,一方面说材料本身性能不好,又说没新意。这样的文章该怎么处理呢?难道没人要了吗?
下面是意见:Dear Dr. *:

Thank you for submitting your manuscript for publication in The Journal of Physical Chemistry. It has been examined by expert reviewers whose reviews are enclosed. After careful consideration of their comments (and my own evaluation of the manuscript), I am unable to accept the manuscript for publication in The Journal of Physical Chemistry. While one review is positve, the other review points out serious objections which make the article unacceptable.

While your work appears to have been carried out with care, unfortunately, we are unable to accept all of the sound work submitted to the journal. We appreciate your choice of The Journal of Physical Chemistry as a possible forum for presentation of your work.

With sincere regards,

Prof. James Lisy
Senior Editor
The Journal of Physical Chemistry
Phone: 217-265-4091
Fax: 202-513-8763
Editor Email: jpc@scs.uiuc.edu

------------------------------------

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1

Recommendation: This paper is not recommended because the material is not appropriate for the Journal of Physical Chemistry.

Comments:

  Thank you for your invitation to review this paper.
  After careful reviewing, I think that this paper cannot be accepted for publication in this journal of "JPC", because it doesnot meet the high standard of JPC. In this paper, the authors hope to prepare the thermo-sensitive drug delivery system. But according to the results shown in Fig.5 and Fig.6, I think that there is no obvious difference between the in vitro release behavior at 45 centigrade and 25 centigrade. That's to say, the prepared microgel didnot show the thermosensitivity actually.
   And I think that PNIPAAM has been studied in many references. The novelty of the manuscript is also very poor.
   So, I think that this paper cannot be accepted for publication.


Additional Questions:

Reviewer: 2

Recommendation: This paper is publishable subject to minor revisions noted.  Further review is not needed.

Comments:
This is one of the series works of authors about thermo-sensitive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)/mesoporous silica nanocomposites and the application in controlled drug release. In this manuscript, the authors compared the release behavior of model drug ibuprofen from the nanocomposites. The results clearly indicated the function of thermo-sensitive polymer in nanocomposites for drug release. Therefore, this work is suitable for the publication in J. Phys. Chem. C. One question is about the loading of IBU. The author used hexane as loading medium in the present work. In hexane, PNIPAM isn’t  a thermo-sensitive polymer. It should be re-explained about the loading of IBU.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)

精益求精,永无止境!
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

tbs01

银虫 (正式写手)

有时候也搞怪,第一个专家说我们的材料几乎没有温敏性能,第二个说有温敏性能,“The results clearly indicated the function of thermo-sensitive polymer in nanocomposites for drug release. ”
精益求精,永无止境!
3楼2009-12-15 11:14:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 10 个回答

tom123kl

木虫 (正式写手)

降低档次重新投,前提是要修好一下,要不有可能落到同一审稿人手里
2楼2009-12-15 11:10:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

linajun

金虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
针对Reviewer的意见对文章进行修改,并且补充可以补充的数据。另外,在Introduction部分在综述别人工作的基础上要引出自己工作的重要性,使文章的创新点得以充分体现!
5楼2009-12-15 12:07:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

polypolymer

金虫 (著名写手)


小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
看了第二个审稿人的意见,特别是他要你解释的部分,我个人觉得第一个审稿人的意见似乎是对的。
6楼2009-12-15 12:28:12
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见