| ²é¿´: 344 | »Ø¸´: 3 | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | |||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | |||
wangzhuo9736ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
ÇóÖú½â¾öÉó¸åÒâ¼û
|
||
|
1£¬The accuracy of micro analyses is extremely high deviations being among hundreds of percentages. That is quite surprising considering the non-phase purity problem addressed in 10) 2£¬I am worried about the structure of 2. There is an Rint of 21.5% and it is not in the same cell setting as 1. In my opinion, isostructural compounds should be reported in the same cell choice. I do not think the Rint would improve simply by choosing P21/c, yet I am concerned as to why this data is so much worse than that for 1. ÎҵϝºÏÎïÊÇÁ½¸ö£¬ËûÃǽṹÊÇÒ»ÑùµÄ¶øÇÒ¶¼Êǵ¥Ð±µÄµ«ÊÇÆäÖÐÒ»¸öÊÇP21/c Ò»¸öÊÇp21/n¡£²¢ÇÒÓÐÒ»¸öRint Öµ±ÈÁíÒ»¸ö´óµ«ÊDzé¹ýÁËÒѾ½ÓÍêÁËѽ¡£×ª»¯¿Õ¼äȺҲÊÔ¹ýÁ˶¼²»ºÃʹ¡£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
MIL-101Óе¥¾§ÑùÆ·Âð
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
ÒÑɾ³ý
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
ÎÞ»ú»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ152È˻ظ´
ÊÕµ÷¼ÁÑо¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
¡¾2026 ¿¼Ñе÷¼Á¡¿¹þ¶û±õ¹¤³Ì´óѧºË¿ÆÑ§Óë¼¼ÊõѧԺºË»¯¹¤Ïµ ÕÐÊÕµ÷¼ÁÉú
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
¡¾2026 ¿¼Ñе÷¼Á¡¿¹þ¶û±õ¹¤³Ì´óѧºË¿ÆÑ§Óë¼¼ÊõѧԺºË»¯¹¤Ïµ ÕÐÊÕµ÷¼ÁÉú
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
¹ãÖÝ´óѧ»·¾³´ó·Ö×Ó²ÄÁÏÑо¿Ëù2026ÄêÑо¿ÉúÕÐÉú¼òÕÂ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Î人·ÄÖ¯´óѧ¼¼ÊõÑо¿ÔºÕÐÊÕ»¯Ñ§¡¢ÉúÎï¡¢²ÄÁÏ¡¢·ÄÖ¯¡¢»úеµÈרҵµ÷¼ÁÉú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
̨ÖÝѧԺÓÐÐò¶à¿×²ÄÁÏÍŶӻ¯Ñ§¡¢²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤Ë¶Ê¿ÕÐÉú£¬ÇëËÙÁªÏµ£¡
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Ê×¶¼Ê¦·¶´óѧ»¯Ñ§ÏµÌïÑó¿ÎÌâ×éר˶Õе÷¼ÁÉú
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
xi2004
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- CMEI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 125 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 16769.9
- É¢½ð: 12393
- ºì»¨: 221
- Ìû×Ó: 4161
- ÔÚÏß: 436.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 354550
- ×¢²á: 2007-04-24
- רҵ: ½á¹¹»¯Ñ§

4Â¥2009-12-01 11:57:57
huahua1216
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÎÄ̳¾«Ó¢)
- CMEI: 1
- Ó¦Öú: 173 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 1.712
- ½ð±Ò: 39220.1
- É¢½ð: 1124
- ºì»¨: 22
- ɳ·¢: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 15279
- ÔÚÏß: 449.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 260203
- ×¢²á: 2006-06-17
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ·ÅÉä·ÖÎö
¡ï ¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
paopaomeng(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл½»Á÷ 12-1 11:59
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
paopaomeng(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл½»Á÷ 12-1 11:59
| ÓÃplaton²é²é¿Õ¼äȺÊDz»ÊÇÕýÈ· |
2Â¥2009-12-01 11:09:02
xi2004
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- CMEI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 125 (¸ßÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 16769.9
- É¢½ð: 12393
- ºì»¨: 221
- Ìû×Ó: 4161
- ÔÚÏß: 436.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 354550
- ×¢²á: 2007-04-24
- רҵ: ½á¹¹»¯Ñ§
¡ï ¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
paopaomeng(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл½»Á÷ 12-1 11:58
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
paopaomeng(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл½»Á÷ 12-1 11:58
|
2£¬I am worried about the structure of 2. There is an Rint of 21.5% and it is not in the same cell setting as 1. In my opinion, isostructural compounds should be reported in the same cell choice. I do not think the Rint would improve simply by choosing P21/c, yet I am concerned as to why this data is so much worse than that for 1. ËûµÄÒâ¼ûÊÇÖпϵÄ. Ҫͳһ³ÉP21/c È»ºó2ÒªÖØÊÕÒ»¸öºÃµÄÊý¾Ý. |

3Â¥2009-12-01 11:57:08














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥