24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 302  |  回复: 3
当前主题已经存档。

wangzhuo9736

木虫 (正式写手)

[交流] 求助解决审稿意见

1,The accuracy of micro analyses is extremely high deviations being among hundreds of percentages. That is quite surprising considering the non-phase purity problem addressed in 10)
2,I am worried about the structure of 2.  There is an Rint of 21.5% and it is not in the same cell setting as 1.  In my opinion, isostructural compounds should be reported in the same cell choice.  I do not think the Rint would improve simply by choosing P21/c, yet I am concerned as to why this data is so much worse than that for 1.
我的化合物是两个,他们结构是一样的而且都是单斜的但是其中一个是P21/c 一个是p21/n。并且有一个Rint 值比另一个大但是查过了已经接完了呀。转化空间群也试过了都不好使。
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

huahua1216

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
paopaomeng(金币+1,VIP+0):谢谢交流 12-1 11:59
用platon查查空间群是不是正确
2楼2009-12-01 11:09:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xi2004

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

★ ★
小木虫(金币+0.5):给个红包,谢谢回帖交流
paopaomeng(金币+1,VIP+0):谢谢交流 12-1 11:58
2,I am worried about the structure of 2.  There is an Rint of 21.5% and it is not in the same cell setting as 1.  In my opinion, isostructural compounds should be reported in the same cell choice.  I do not think the Rint would improve simply by choosing P21/c, yet I am concerned as to why this data is so much worse than that for 1.

他的意见是中肯的.
要统一成P21/c
然后2要重收一个好的数据.
xi2004-emuch@163.com
3楼2009-12-01 11:57:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xi2004

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

如果2仅仅多一个结构报道而已, 可以选择不报道2的.
xi2004-emuch@163.com
4楼2009-12-01 11:57:57
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 wangzhuo9736 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见