24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

qweasd12345

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 95.4
散金: 25
帖子: 144
在线: 172.3小时
虫号: 3912145
注册: 2015-06-06
专业: 数论

[求助] 这种情况要不要发邮件问下编辑找审稿人要具体的修改意见呀？已有2人参与

审稿人只给每项打分和大修总评意见，没有给具体的修改意见。投稿系统和邮件附件里都找了，都没有。问下这种情况要不要发邮件问下编辑找审稿人要具体的修改意见呀？

从每项给得YES/NO来看，审稿人是不是觉得创新点写得不是很清楚。

recommendation: major revision

comments:
(there are no comments. please check to see if comments were included as a file attachment with this e-mail or as an attachment in your author center.)

additional questions:
1. subject matter appropriate to scope of tps?: yes

2. sufficient new technical/physics advances (original work)?: no

3. proper context with related work / adequate references? *: yes

4. appropriate quality of presentation? **: no

5. suitable title?: yes

6. adequate abstract?: no

7. should manuscript be shortened?: no

8. clear figures with captions?: yes

9. english satisfactory? ***: yes

if you are suggesting additional references they must be entered in the text box provided. all suggestions must include full bibliographic information plus a doi.

if you are not suggesting references, please type "n/a" in the text area below.
: n/a

overall rating of paper: good

回复此楼