24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 501  |  回复: 3
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

qweasd12345

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 这种情况要不要发邮件问下编辑找审稿人要具体的修改意见呀?已有2人参与

审稿人只给每项打分和大修总评意见,没有给具体的修改意见。投稿系统和邮件附件里都找了,都没有。问下这种情况要不要发邮件问下编辑找审稿人要具体的修改意见呀?

从每项给得YES/NO来看,审稿人是不是觉得创新点写得不是很清楚。


recommendation: major revision

comments:
(there are no comments. please check to see if comments were included as a file attachment with this e-mail or as an attachment in your author center.)

additional questions:
1. subject matter appropriate to scope of tps?: yes

2. sufficient new technical/physics advances (original work)?: no

3. proper context with related work / adequate references? *: yes

4. appropriate quality of presentation? **: no

5. suitable title?: yes

6. adequate abstract?: no

7. should manuscript be shortened?: no

8. clear figures with captions?: yes

9. english satisfactory? ***: yes

if you are suggesting additional references they must be entered in the text box provided.  all suggestions must include full bibliographic information plus a doi.



if you are not suggesting references, please type "n/a" in the text area below.
: n/a

overall rating of paper: good
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 qweasd12345 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见