| 查看: 2373 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
PNAS投稿理解求助 已有3人参与
|
|||
|
最近投稿了一篇PNAS，内容是模式植物植物杂种优势的研究，个人觉得很有创新性。 被Editorial Board拒稿了 给的理由是The submission is better suited for a specialty journal. 换投plant cell，编辑还有那个PNAS编辑，请问他是认可还是不认可呀，还要他做编辑吗？ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.5.4,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
filecode
已经有12人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有6人回复
-
filecode=后面第一个是大写字母
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有6人回复
5楼2024-05-27 15:24:52
|
PNAS is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to publish high-impact research of general interest to the scientific community. Because we receive more than 18,000 submissions every year, incoming manuscripts undergo an initial evaluation by a member of the Editorial Board, who is also a member of the National Academy of Sciences, to determine whether the potential novelty, impact, and relevance in the broad scientific community merit further detailed technical review. In your case, our assessment is that your manuscript does not meet one or more of the principal aims of our journal and on this basis we expect that the likelihood that detailed review will lead to publication is low. This decision is necessarily subjective and does not reflect an evaluation of the technical quality of your work or of its appropriateness for a more specialized audience. 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
2楼2024-05-26 14:10:15
aspect3000
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 190 (高中生)
- 金币: 35236.2
- 散金: 955
- 红花: 57
- 沙发: 3
- 帖子: 7723
- 在线: 1207.9小时
- 虫号: 44782
- 注册: 2004-05-01
- 专业: 有机分析
3楼2024-05-27 06:17:33
4楼2024-05-27 10:24:15
