| 查看: 1995 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
PNAS投稿理解求助 已有3人参与
|
|||
|
最近投稿了一篇PNAS，内容是模式植物植物杂种优势的研究，个人觉得很有创新性。 被Editorial Board拒稿了 给的理由是The submission is better suited for a specialty journal. 换投plant cell，编辑还有那个PNAS编辑，请问他是认可还是不认可呀，还要他做编辑吗？ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料专业求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
材料专硕英一数二306
已经有8人回复
-
一志愿河北工业大学0817化工278分求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
请教下大家 2026年国家基金申请是双盲审吗？
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿南航材料专317分求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
环境学硕288求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
一志愿华东理工大学081700，初试分数271
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿重庆大学085700资源与环境，总分308求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
化学308分求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
085600材料与化工调剂
已经有11人回复
5楼2024-05-27 15:24:52
|
PNAS is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to publish high-impact research of general interest to the scientific community. Because we receive more than 18,000 submissions every year, incoming manuscripts undergo an initial evaluation by a member of the Editorial Board, who is also a member of the National Academy of Sciences, to determine whether the potential novelty, impact, and relevance in the broad scientific community merit further detailed technical review. In your case, our assessment is that your manuscript does not meet one or more of the principal aims of our journal and on this basis we expect that the likelihood that detailed review will lead to publication is low. This decision is necessarily subjective and does not reflect an evaluation of the technical quality of your work or of its appropriateness for a more specialized audience. 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
2楼2024-05-26 14:10:15
aspect3000
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 189 (高中生)
- 金币: 33606.8
- 散金: 955
- 红花: 56
- 沙发: 3
- 帖子: 7466
- 在线: 1184.3小时
- 虫号: 44782
- 注册: 2004-05-01
- 专业: 有机分析
3楼2024-05-27 06:17:33
4楼2024-05-27 10:24:15
