| 查看: 2370 | 回复: 5 | |||
[交流]
PNAS投稿理解求助 已有3人参与
|
|
最近投稿了一篇PNAS，内容是模式植物植物杂种优势的研究，个人觉得很有创新性。 被Editorial Board拒稿了 给的理由是The submission is better suited for a specialty journal. 换投plant cell，编辑还有那个PNAS编辑，请问他是认可还是不认可呀，还要他做编辑吗？ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
小木虫上这么多卖论文的，真有人买论文么？感觉没必要啊
已经有13人回复
-
时间戳又变了8-15
已经有15人回复
-
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有58人回复
-
哪位老哥知道今年的国自然具体哪一天放榜？
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有9人回复
|
PNAS is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to publish high-impact research of general interest to the scientific community. Because we receive more than 18,000 submissions every year, incoming manuscripts undergo an initial evaluation by a member of the Editorial Board, who is also a member of the National Academy of Sciences, to determine whether the potential novelty, impact, and relevance in the broad scientific community merit further detailed technical review. In your case, our assessment is that your manuscript does not meet one or more of the principal aims of our journal and on this basis we expect that the likelihood that detailed review will lead to publication is low. This decision is necessarily subjective and does not reflect an evaluation of the technical quality of your work or of its appropriateness for a more specialized audience. 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
2楼2024-05-26 14:10:15
aspect3000
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 190 (高中生)
- 金币: 35236.2
- 散金: 955
- 红花: 57
- 沙发: 3
- 帖子: 7723
- 在线: 1207.9小时
- 虫号: 44782
- 注册: 2004-05-01
- 专业: 有机分析
3楼2024-05-27 06:17:33
4楼2024-05-27 10:24:15
5楼2024-05-27 15:24:52
6楼2025-05-19 22:23:29
