| 查看: 2134 | 回复: 5 | |||
[交流]
PNAS投稿理解求助 已有3人参与
|
|
最近投稿了一篇PNAS，内容是模式植物植物杂种优势的研究，个人觉得很有创新性。 被Editorial Board拒稿了 给的理由是The submission is better suited for a specialty journal. 换投plant cell，编辑还有那个PNAS编辑，请问他是认可还是不认可呀，还要他做编辑吗？ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
今年审到国自然15份，谈谈感受
已经有18人回复
-
26/27博士推荐
已经有5人回复
-
评审有感
已经有19人回复
-
献血感触
已经有11人回复
-
上海大学实验技术岗位非升即走
已经有12人回复
-
如何实现卤原子转化
已经有7人回复
-
云南大学材料与能源学院解琳课题组钙钛矿博士招生
已经有5人回复
-
2026山东省优青
已经有4人回复
-
反应很差，大量原料没有反应
已经有3人回复
-
Sci. Bull. 悲剧经验
已经有4人回复
|
PNAS is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to publish high-impact research of general interest to the scientific community. Because we receive more than 18,000 submissions every year, incoming manuscripts undergo an initial evaluation by a member of the Editorial Board, who is also a member of the National Academy of Sciences, to determine whether the potential novelty, impact, and relevance in the broad scientific community merit further detailed technical review. In your case, our assessment is that your manuscript does not meet one or more of the principal aims of our journal and on this basis we expect that the likelihood that detailed review will lead to publication is low. This decision is necessarily subjective and does not reflect an evaluation of the technical quality of your work or of its appropriateness for a more specialized audience. 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
2楼2024-05-26 14:10:15
aspect3000
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 189 (高中生)
- 金币: 34475.8
- 散金: 955
- 红花: 56
- 沙发: 3
- 帖子: 7549
- 在线: 1196.9小时
- 虫号: 44782
- 注册: 2004-05-01
- 专业: 有机分析
3楼2024-05-27 06:17:33
4楼2024-05-27 10:24:15
5楼2024-05-27 15:24:52
6楼2025-05-19 22:23:29
5