| 查看: 1283 | 回复: 3 | ||
[交流]
一审返回审稿人拒稿 已有3人参与
|
|
投稿9.9分的期刊，三个审稿人。审稿人2，3，修改，审稿人1意见如下 Reviewer #1: 1. Several sections of the paper were deemed insufficiently detailed, and the methodology lacked clear descriptions and justification for the experimental procedures. 2. The poor data analysis and interpretation, suggesting the need for more analysis and discussion of the results, such as overall water splitting test, H2 and O2 production test. 3. The novelty of the research is very low and lack of substantial contributions to the existing knowledge in the field. 4. In the introduction section the authors need to positioned novelty within the existing literature, clearly highlighting the unique aspects and contributions of the study. 主编让大修。修完，审稿人2，审稿人3，Accept 审稿人1如下：Reviewer #1: The answers provided by authors are not reliable and subjective. 编辑给了大修，继续回答审稿人1的4个问题 问问大佬，从哪个角度回复 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
回复此楼
半生梦君
新虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 3017.5
- 散金: 200
- 沙发: 112
- 帖子: 3505
- 在线: 639.5小时
- 虫号: 33637970
- 注册: 2023-04-23
- 专业: 泛函分析
2楼2023-08-19 17:30:54
chaodanming
木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 19 (小学生)
- 金币: 8700.9
- 散金: 8969
- 红花: 25
- 帖子: 3955
- 在线: 651.4小时
- 虫号: 2512920
- 注册: 2013-06-18
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 功能与智能高分子
3楼2023-08-19 17:40:34
 本帖仅楼主可见 |
4楼2025-04-04 05:17:10