| 查看: 1250 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
一审返回审稿人拒稿 已有3人参与
|
|||
|
投稿9.9分的期刊，三个审稿人。审稿人2，3，修改，审稿人1意见如下 Reviewer #1: 1. Several sections of the paper were deemed insufficiently detailed, and the methodology lacked clear descriptions and justification for the experimental procedures. 2. The poor data analysis and interpretation, suggesting the need for more analysis and discussion of the results, such as overall water splitting test, H2 and O2 production test. 3. The novelty of the research is very low and lack of substantial contributions to the existing knowledge in the field. 4. In the introduction section the authors need to positioned novelty within the existing literature, clearly highlighting the unique aspects and contributions of the study. 主编让大修。修完，审稿人2，审稿人3，Accept 审稿人1如下：Reviewer #1: The answers provided by authors are not reliable and subjective. 编辑给了大修，继续回答审稿人1的4个问题 问问大佬，从哪个角度回复 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
不自信的我
已经有11人回复
-
北核录用
已经有3人回复
-
要不要辞职读博？
已经有6人回复
-
实验室接单子
已经有3人回复
-
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！
已经有8人回复
-
求助:我三月中下旬出站，青基依托单位怎么办？
已经有10人回复
-
26申博（荧光探针方向，有机合成）
已经有4人回复
-
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有26人回复
-
2026年机械制造与材料应用国际会议 （ICMMMA 2026）
已经有4人回复
-
Cas 72-43-5需要30g，定制合成，能接单的留言
已经有8人回复