| 查看: 3079 | 回复: 33 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 chun_yan 的 77 个金币 ，回帖就立即获得 1 个金币，每人有 1 次机会 | |||
[交流]
俄乌冲突，殃及池鱼（大家遇到过我这种倒霉情况吗？）
|
|||
|
四年前我的课题与俄罗斯的团队进行了合作，2021年3月第一次投稿，被拒，补了一年多实验，2022年5月重新投稿，送审。经过三轮审稿，现在编辑说由于俄乌战争，不允许俄罗斯科研人员所在单位出现在文章里，可能以个人名义发表，但是具体怎么裁定到现在也没下来，已经等了快俩月了。。 俄罗斯团队为我们做出了重要结果，不让其带上单位发表论文显然不合适，但现在撤稿也不划算。杂志那边也是逗，第一次投稿时俄乌战争没有开始，而第二次从投稿到审稿阶段，竟从来没提过这事，结果现在给我整这出。。 还有，看谁今后还说科学无国界  附上主编的回复 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: Re:TPC2023-RA-00200DR1 Receipt of revised MS by The Plant Cell. Dear Dr. Li, I sincerely apologize for the lengthy delay in our response. The issue is an unusual one: a discussion within the society (ASPB) about how to handle manuscripts with Russian Institutions as affiliations. Since the start of the dreadful, unprovoked, and cruel war on Ukraine, there have been discussions and debates about what to do with these papers, which are relatively few. While in no way comparable to the humanitarian disaster that Russia has caused, Ukrainian science has been decimated, and the scientists and their families are in terrible situations, along with their countrymen. While we are of course reluctant to penalize our Russian colleagues and authors – for as individuals, they are often friends and collaborators – but allowing Russian institutions to go about their business as if nothing has happened hardly seems appropriate. It’s slightly analogous to the situation in sports, including the Olympics, in which Russian athletes have faced unusual circumstances for the same reasons (plus the history of doping). In that case, the international decision was to allow individuals to compete, but not representing the institution of Russian national athletics, and instead as unaffiliated athletes. I referred your manuscript to the ASPB’s “Publications Committee” for their input. They have been slow to reach a decision. I will follow up with them. We know that you originally submitted before Russia attacked Ukraine, and that the paper went through one or two other decision points after the invasion, and the institutional affiliations weren’t noticed at that time. Again, my apologies for the complexity of the situation, and that your paper was caught up in this. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
40+中年人失业后，还能找到好工作吗？
已经有11人回复
-
用NBS溴化时溶剂除了CCl4外还有什么
已经有6人回复
-
申请科研项目纯靠实力能成功吗？
已经有11人回复
-
极限拉扯，如何抉择
已经有15人回复
-
二审4个多月了还是Awaiting Reviewer Scores
已经有4人回复
-
OpenAI又攻克数学难题了，离AI做有机合成还有多远？
已经有13人回复
-
课题组会帮你通过考核么？
已经有7人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有10人回复
18楼2023-07-30 23:18:02
21楼2023-07-31 10:55:15
7楼2023-07-30 01:58:53
32楼2023-08-02 10:20:37
chenhuanlong
禁虫 (文学泰斗)
★
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
4楼2023-07-29 21:34:39
★
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
11楼2023-07-30 09:31:45
14楼2023-07-30 17:07:37
15楼2023-07-30 17:08:55
16楼2023-07-30 19:04:28
19楼2023-07-31 07:56:52
20楼2023-07-31 08:03:21
22楼2023-07-31 10:57:47
23楼2023-07-31 10:58:20
24楼2023-07-31 11:01:47
26楼2023-07-31 18:42:37
27楼2023-07-31 21:44:47
★
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
做中国人要有骨气，论文算啥呀，不能为一篇论文丢了骨气，再说俄罗斯团队做出了贡献，本来就该有署名，否则岂不是变成“偷”了。如果抹杀俄罗斯团队的贡献，不但我们不仗义，更显得我们中国没骨气 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
29楼2023-08-02 08:06:07
30楼2023-08-02 09:29:30
31楼2023-08-02 09:34:26
33楼2023-08-02 10:22:15
简单回复
tzynew2楼
2023-07-29 20:46
回复
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
i 发自小木虫Android客户端
yuekong3楼
2023-07-29 20:53
回复
甄士隐2075楼
2023-07-29 21:40
回复
2023-07-29 22:01
回复
2023-07-30 07:09
回复
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
sdlclqt9楼
2023-07-30 07:22
回复
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
唉 发自小木虫Android客户端
jiaoxg10楼
2023-07-30 08:55
回复
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
我才是肖牧冲12楼
2023-07-30 11:09
回复
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
gter_wang13楼
2023-07-30 14:37
回复
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
Superge2017楼
2023-07-30 22:06
回复
miaojiabing25楼
2023-07-31 15:03
回复
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
lylgszy28楼
2023-08-01 08:34
回复
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
yexuqing34楼
2023-08-02 18:29
回复
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
200