| 查看: 2847 | 回复: 33 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 chun_yan 的 77 个金币 ，回帖就立即获得 1 个金币，每人有 1 次机会 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
俄乌冲突，殃及池鱼（大家遇到过我这种倒霉情况吗？）
|
|||
|
四年前我的课题与俄罗斯的团队进行了合作，2021年3月第一次投稿，被拒，补了一年多实验，2022年5月重新投稿，送审。经过三轮审稿，现在编辑说由于俄乌战争，不允许俄罗斯科研人员所在单位出现在文章里，可能以个人名义发表，但是具体怎么裁定到现在也没下来，已经等了快俩月了。。 俄罗斯团队为我们做出了重要结果，不让其带上单位发表论文显然不合适，但现在撤稿也不划算。杂志那边也是逗，第一次投稿时俄乌战争没有开始，而第二次从投稿到审稿阶段，竟从来没提过这事，结果现在给我整这出。。 还有，看谁今后还说科学无国界  附上主编的回复 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: Re:TPC2023-RA-00200DR1 Receipt of revised MS by The Plant Cell. Dear Dr. Li, I sincerely apologize for the lengthy delay in our response. The issue is an unusual one: a discussion within the society (ASPB) about how to handle manuscripts with Russian Institutions as affiliations. Since the start of the dreadful, unprovoked, and cruel war on Ukraine, there have been discussions and debates about what to do with these papers, which are relatively few. While in no way comparable to the humanitarian disaster that Russia has caused, Ukrainian science has been decimated, and the scientists and their families are in terrible situations, along with their countrymen. While we are of course reluctant to penalize our Russian colleagues and authors – for as individuals, they are often friends and collaborators – but allowing Russian institutions to go about their business as if nothing has happened hardly seems appropriate. It’s slightly analogous to the situation in sports, including the Olympics, in which Russian athletes have faced unusual circumstances for the same reasons (plus the history of doping). In that case, the international decision was to allow individuals to compete, but not representing the institution of Russian national athletics, and instead as unaffiliated athletes. I referred your manuscript to the ASPB’s “Publications Committee” for their input. They have been slow to reach a decision. I will follow up with them. We know that you originally submitted before Russia attacked Ukraine, and that the paper went through one or two other decision points after the invasion, and the institutional affiliations weren’t noticed at that time. Again, my apologies for the complexity of the situation, and that your paper was caught up in this. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
明天应该可查了！？
已经有5人回复
-
如果此刻你正在为国基感到焦虑，不妨来听听这首《基金之外》
已经有7人回复
-
没有任何消息-是不是就凉了
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
人气不行了
已经有10人回复
-
我面上完蛋了
已经有10人回复
-
能否退出参与的面上项目解除限项
已经有24人回复
-
filecode，4个jtjc了
已经有17人回复
-
2026国自然函评费到账
已经有19人回复
30楼2023-08-02 09:29:30
chenhuanlong
禁虫 (文学泰斗)
★
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
4楼2023-07-29 21:34:39
7楼2023-07-30 01:58:53
★
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
|
本帖内容被屏蔽 |
11楼2023-07-30 09:31:45
简单回复
jiaoxg10楼
2023-07-30 08:55
回复
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
yuekong3楼
2023-07-29 20:53
回复
tzynew2楼
2023-07-29 20:46
回复
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
i 发自小木虫Android客户端
2023-07-29 22:01
回复
甄士隐2075楼
2023-07-29 21:40
回复
我才是肖牧冲12楼
2023-07-30 11:09
回复
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
sdlclqt9楼
2023-07-30 07:22
回复
chun_yan(金币+1): 谢谢参与
唉 发自小木虫Android客户端
