24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 chun_yan 的 77 个金币，回帖就立即获得 1 个金币，每人有 1 次机会

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

chun_yan

铜虫 (小有名气)

应助: 2 (幼儿园)
金币: 5100.7
帖子: 71
在线: 71.8小时
虫号: 2014670

[交流] 俄乌冲突，殃及池鱼（大家遇到过我这种倒霉情况吗？）

四年前我的课题与俄罗斯的团队进行了合作，2021年3月第一次投稿，被拒，补了一年多实验，2022年5月重新投稿，送审。经过三轮审稿，现在编辑说由于俄乌战争，不允许俄罗斯科研人员所在单位出现在文章里，可能以个人名义发表，但是具体怎么裁定到现在也没下来，已经等了快俩月了。。

俄罗斯团队为我们做出了重要结果，不让其带上单位发表论文显然不合适，但现在撤稿也不划算。杂志那边也是逗，第一次投稿时俄乌战争没有开始，而第二次从投稿到审稿阶段，竟从来没提过这事，结果现在给我整这出。。

还有，看谁今后还说科学无国界

附上主编的回复
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: Re:TPC2023-RA-00200DR1 Receipt of revised MS by The Plant Cell.
Dear Dr. Li,

I sincerely apologize for the lengthy delay in our response. The issue is an unusual one: a discussion within the society (ASPB) about how to handle manuscripts with Russian Institutions as affiliations. Since the start of the dreadful, unprovoked, and cruel war on Ukraine, there have been discussions and debates about what to do with these papers, which are relatively few. While in no way comparable to the humanitarian disaster that Russia has caused, Ukrainian science has been decimated, and the scientists and their families are in terrible situations, along with their countrymen. While we are of course reluctant to penalize our Russian colleagues and authors – for as individuals, they are often friends and collaborators – but allowing Russian institutions to go about their business as if nothing has happened hardly seems appropriate.

It’s slightly analogous to the situation in sports, including the Olympics, in which Russian athletes have faced unusual circumstances for the same reasons (plus the history of doping). In that case, the international decision was to allow individuals to compete, but not representing the institution of Russian national athletics, and instead as unaffiliated athletes.

I referred your manuscript to the ASPB’s “Publications Committee” for their input. They have been slow to reach a decision. I will follow up with them. We know that you originally submitted before Russia attacked Ukraine, and that the paper went through one or two other decision points after the invasion, and the institutional affiliations weren’t noticed at that time.

Again, my apologies for the complexity of the situation, and that your paper was caught up in this.

回复此楼