| 查看: 1215 | 回复: 20 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
两种截然不同的审稿意见，怎么办？
|
|||
两种截然不同的审稿意见，编辑认为“Although the referees found this manuscript interesting and useful, a majority felt that this work is not suitable for publication in Chemistry Letter.”，第二个审稿人的意见只是有一点道理，编辑为什么不找第三审稿人，还有申辩的可能吗？ -------------------- Referee A Comment: -------------------- 1. Review Result: [1. Publish without change] 2. Rating (Importance of this manuscript) : [5] 3. Reviewer's Comments to the Author(s) (if any) : "This manuscript describes ×××××, this manuscript will be acceptable for Chemistry Letter. Minor error (page 2, left column, 2 paragraph, 6 lines from bottom: ketoreducatases-----ketoreductases) -------------------- Referee B Comment: -------------------- 1. Review Result: [3. Not to be published in Chemistry Letter, because] The results do not meet the criteria of novelty required as a communication. 2. Rating (Importance of this manuscript) : [3] 3. Reviewer's Comments to the Author(s) (if any) : "This manuscript reports ×××××. For these reasons, this manuscript should be rejected." |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
国基评审
已经有6人回复
-
国自然面上和省基金B类撒花
已经有20人回复
-
急招9月入学博士，要有4级、最晚7月硕士毕业。精密电机驱控课题；学位材料
已经有5人回复
-
又一批高校组建人工智能学院 师资行吗 不是骗人吗
已经有7人回复
-
有没有学校收留
已经有3人回复
-
312求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
华师大读博
已经有5人回复
-
急需审稿人！！！
已经有3人回复
-
申博/考博
已经有8人回复
-
085600材料与化工调剂
已经有6人回复
zhaomg
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 650.8
- 散金: 202
- 帖子: 808
- 在线: 37.8小时
- 虫号: 600013
- 注册: 2008-09-12
- 专业: 粒子物理学和场论
16楼2009-09-19 15:28:14
2楼2009-09-19 10:41:38
3楼2009-09-19 10:45:15
|
编辑的?z见如下，就是j拒稿，还能反驳吗？ Dear ××× Your manuscript has been reviewed with the aid of two independent referees whose reports are attached to this mail. Although the referees found this manuscript interesting and useful, a majority felt that this work is not suitable for publication in Chemistry Letter. We sincerely regret to inform you that it is not acceptable for publication in Chemistry Letters. Thank you for giving us an opportunity to review your work. We would gladly welcome any future submissions for consideration for publication in Chem. Lett. Sincerely yours, ××× |
4楼2009-09-19 10:48:43