±±¾©Ê¯ÓÍ»¯¹¤Ñ§Ôº2026ÄêÑо¿ÉúÕÐÉú½ÓÊÕµ÷¼Á¹«¸æ
²é¿´: 1102  |  »Ø¸´: 5
µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ­´æµµ¡£
¡¾Óн±½»Á÷¡¿»ý¼«»Ø¸´±¾Ìû×Ó£¬²ÎÓë½»Á÷£¬¾ÍÓлú»á·ÖµÃ×÷Õß jghe µÄ 1 ¸ö½ð±Ò

jghe

½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

[½»Á÷] ¡¾ÇóÖú¡¿alpha+bet ÊÇʲôÒâ˼£¿

OUTCARÀïµÄ E-fermi :   7.4279     XC(G=0): -13.2605     alpha+bet :-12.7584
³ýÁËfermi Äܼ¶ÍâºóÃæÁ½¸öÊÇʲôÒâ˼£¿
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥

» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼­ÍƼö

µÚÒ»ÐÔÔ­ÀíÏà¹ØÎĵµ

» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶

ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

jghe

½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
fegg7502(½ð±Ò+3,VIP+0):thank you very much! 9-20 16:38
vaspÂÛ̳ÉϵÄתÌù
The fermi level (and the eigenvalues) are calculated based on a potential that does not include the G=0 component of the pseudopotential or the G=0 component of the coulombic potential (which is ill defined anyway). The term XC(G=0) is the G=0 component of the exchange-correlation potential. The alpha part of Alpha+bet is the G=0 term of the pseudopotential * (ZVAL/NELECT) where ZVAL is the total valance of the ions and NELECT is the total number of electrons (equal in a neutral cell). I have no idea what the beta part of Alpha+bet is.

In my opinion, Alpha+bet is useless for calculating the work function or correcting the eigenvalues to be relative to vacuum. The best way to do this for a slab calculation is to use IDIPOL=3 and LDIPOL=.TRUE. (if the surface is normal to the z direction). This will correct for any dipole interactions between neighboring slabs and will also give you the vacuum potential on both sides of the slab. Just subtract the vacuum potential for the side of the slab that represents the actual surface from the fermi level to get the work function

if your vacuum size is thick enough, the potential should level off to a constant value in the center of the vacuum. Please use the LVTOT=True input parameter and use the tool vtotav.f (with the LOCPOT file) to get the "zero" vacuum potential. The Fermi level should be taken as difference between the calculated fermi energy and this vacuum level then.

http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp-forum/forum_viewtopic.php?4.1609

ÕâÒ»¾ä The Fermi level should be taken as difference between the calculated fermi energy and this vacuum level then. ÎҾͲ»Ã÷°×ÁË£¬ difference between the calculated fermi energy and this vacuum level Ó¦¸ÃÊǹ¦º¯Êý²Å¶Ô°¡£¬Ôõô˵ÊÇ·ÑÃ×Äܼ¶£¬¸÷λÓÐʲô¸ß¼û°¢
2Â¥2009-09-18 09:30:41
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

veryman

ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

$_$

¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
zdhlover(½ð±Ò+3,VIP+0):лл£¬»¶Ó­³£À´½»Á÷ÌÖÂÛ 9-17 19:33
µÚÈý¶Î»°ÊÇvasp°æÖ÷дµÄ£¬ËûµÄÒâ˼Ӧ¸ÃÊÇ˵ֱ½ÓÕâÑùµÃ³öÀ´µÄfermi energy²»¹»×¼È·£¬ÐèÒªÔÚÔÙËã³öÒ»¸öÐÞÕýÓõÄvacuum potential£¨Ê¹ÓÃvtotav.f £¿£©£¬È»ºóÏë¼õµÃµ½×¼È·µÄFermi level °É¡£
·ÑÃ×ÄܼõÈ¥Õæ¿ÕÄܼ¶µÃµ½µÄÊǹ¦º¯Êý£¿ÎҸоõ¹¦º¯ÊýµÄ¶¨ÒåºÍÕâÀïдµÄºÃÏñÓÐЩ²»Ì«Ò»Ñù¡£µ±È»Õâ·½ÃæÎÒÀí½âµÄ²»É²»¶ÔÖ®´¦»¶Ó­Ö¸Õý¡£
3Â¥2009-09-18 09:52:58
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

jghe

½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

¡ï ¡ï
fegg7502(½ð±Ò+2,VIP+0):thank you very much! 9-20 16:39
Õæ¿ÕÄܼ¶¼õÈ¥·ÑÃ×Äܼ¶µÄÈ´Êǹ¦º¯Êý
ÕâÒ²ÊÇvaspµÄ°àÖ÷˵µÄ
the work function Phi will then be evaluated from
Phi = V(vacuum) - E_fermi
with V(vacuum) ... potential in the center of the vacuum of the slab
E_fermi ... Ferni level (given in OUTCAR).
please be aware that the vacuum should be large enough to guarantee that the
potential has reached its _constant_ vacuum level.

http://cms.mpi.univie.ac.at/vasp-forum/forum_viewtopic.php?4.32

ÎҸ㲻¶®ËûËù˵µÄÐÞÕýÊÇÔõôһ»ØÊ£¿
4Â¥2009-09-18 20:31:48
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

veryman

ľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)

$_$

¡ï
jghe(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл²ÎÓëÌÖÂÛ 9-20 10:54
´Ólz¶þÂ¥Ìû×ÓÀïÃæµÄÐÅÏ¢ÎÒ·ÖÎö¹À¼Ævasp°æÖ÷ÊÇд´íÁË£¬difference between the calculated fermi energy and this vacuum level Ö¸µÄ¾ÍÊÇÉÏÃæÌáÎÊÕß˵µÄwork function¡£
5Â¥2009-09-20 10:14:40
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû

jghe

½ð³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)

¡ï
fegg7502(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):¹ÄÀø½»Á÷2 9-20 16:39
Ó¦¸Ã²»»á°É£¬ËûµÄÒâ˼ÊÇ˵Ҫͨ¹ýÕæ¿ÕÄܼ¶Ð£Õý£¬ÎÒ²»ÖªµÀÔõôУÕý
6Â¥2009-09-20 10:55:56
ÒÑÔÄ   »Ø¸´´ËÂ¥   ¹Ø×¢TA ¸øTA·¢ÏûÏ¢ ËÍTAºì»¨ TAµÄ»ØÌû
Ïà¹Ø°æ¿éÌø×ª ÎÒÒª¶©ÔÄÂ¥Ö÷ jghe µÄÖ÷Ìâ¸üÐÂ
×î¾ßÈËÆøÈÈÌûÍÆ¼ö [²é¿´È«²¿] ×÷Õß »Ø/¿´ ×îºó·¢±í
[¿¼ÑÐ] 085600 295·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +17 W55j 2026-03-30 21/1050 2026-04-03 01:10 by BruceLiu320
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0856²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤µ÷¼Á£¬339 +14 10213207 2026-03-31 14/700 2026-04-02 21:01 by 1104338198
[¿¼ÑÐ] 070305¸ß·Ö×Ó»¯Ñ§ÓëÎïÀí 304·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á +16 c297914 2026-03-28 16/800 2026-04-02 20:50 by dongzh2009
[¿¼ÑÐ] Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ª¶«Àí¹¤´óѧ£¬080500ѧ˶£¬317·Ö£¬Çóµ÷¼Á +13 s1145 2026-03-31 14/700 2026-04-02 18:55 by ŶŶàŹþ
[ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å] chinese chemical lettersÓ¢ÎİæÍ¶¸åÇóÖú 120+4 Yishengeryi 2026-03-30 6/300 2026-04-02 17:19 by Yishengeryi
[¿¼ÑÐ] 348Çóµ÷¼Á +6 ÎâÑå׿24k 2026-04-02 6/300 2026-04-02 14:07 by ¸øÄãÄã×¢ÒâÐÝÏ¢
[¿¼ÑÐ] 372Çóµ÷¼Á +3 jjÓ¿77 2026-04-02 3/150 2026-04-02 09:57 by olim
[¿¼ÑÐ] 270µ÷¼Á +7 maxjxbsk 2026-04-02 7/350 2026-04-02 09:50 by yulian1987
[¿¼ÑÐ] 279Çóµ÷¼Á +6 ѧ¶øË¼ÙâÖª 2026-04-01 6/300 2026-04-02 09:16 by vgtyfty
[¿¼ÑÐ] 348»·¾³¹¤³Ìµ÷¼Á +3 ÎâÑå׿24k 2026-04-01 3/150 2026-04-02 09:14 by nanaliuyun
[¿¼ÑÐ] °²È«¹¤³Ì 285 Çóµ÷¼Á +3 Xinyu56 2026-04-01 4/200 2026-04-01 21:50 by ¾²¾²¾²¾²¾²¾²¾²¾
[¿¼ÑÐ] Çóµ÷¼Á0703 +5 ÖܼÎÒ¢ 2026-03-31 8/400 2026-04-01 20:32 by ltltkkk
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0855»úе³õÊÔ280Çóµ÷¼Á +3 kazenotori 2026-03-31 3/150 2026-04-01 10:08 by JourneyLucky
[¿¼ÑÐ] 288×ÊÔ´Óë»·¾³×¨Ë¶Çóµ÷¼Á£¬²»ÏÞרҵ£¬ÓÐѧÉϾÍÐÐ +25 lllllos 2026-03-30 26/1300 2026-04-01 09:52 by Ò»Ö»ºÃ¹û×Ó?
[¿¼ÑÐ] 0856²ÄÁÏ»¯¹¤µ÷¼Á ×Ü·Ö330 +18 zhubinhao 2026-03-27 18/900 2026-04-01 09:37 by oooqiao
[¿¼ÑÐ] 289Çóµ÷¼Á +7 BrightLL 2026-03-29 7/350 2026-03-31 22:05 by 544594351
[¿¼ÑÐ] 346Çóµ÷¼Á Ò»Ö¾Ô¸070303Óлú»¯Ñ§ +11 Âܲ·ìÀÇà²Ë 2026-03-28 12/600 2026-03-31 17:54 by xhai2011
[¿¼ÑÐ] 329Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Î÷±±¹¤Òµ´óѧ£¬²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì£¨085601£© +6 СС»úÁ鳿 2026-03-29 12/600 2026-03-31 16:58 by ¼Çʱ¾2026
[¿¼ÑÐ] ÎïÀíѧµ÷¼Á +4 СÑò36 2026-03-30 4/200 2026-03-31 16:16 by lishahe
[¿¼ÑÐ] 298µ÷¼Á +3 jiyingjie123 2026-03-27 3/150 2026-03-27 11:57 by wxiongid
ÐÅÏ¢Ìáʾ
ÇëÌî´¦ÀíÒâ¼û