| 查看: 264 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者liaowangna将赠送您 70 个金币 | |||
liaowangna新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
求助如何回复审稿人提出的晶体学意见
|
||
|
投了一篇Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry，审稿人提了两个专业的问题，求助各位大牛，该如何回复，谢谢。 （1）I am puzzled by the displacement parameters in the two structures. The data collection temperature was 100 K, but even so the adps seem tiny. In fact for the triclinic structure, refinement with Shelxl rather than olex.refine causes the O-atom to become non-positive definite. I notice that very tight ISOR restraints were applied to the refinement, though this isn't mentioned in the experimental section and such high weights can not be physically reasonable. ISOR 0.001 0.002 $C $N $O $F ISOR 0.0001 0.0002 S1 （2）Both structures were determined using Cu-K\a radiation and since they contain iodine, absorption was fierce. I suspect that the multiscan corrections applied are not quite up to the job, and preliminary face indexed corrections might be a good idea for both structures. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
硕博巨婴，也许才刚刚开始
已经有64人回复
-
投稿被一个审稿人恶意评审了怎么样？
已经有7人回复
-
面青地会评时间
已经有5人回复
-
关于2023的收入
已经有34人回复
-
累并快乐着
已经有13人回复
-
每次骚扰女学生的都是院系领导，而不是普通教师，小编们要注意措辞正确
已经有9人回复
-
博后面上今天有bug可以看到是否资助？
已经有31人回复
-
关于博后基金的bug问题
已经有9人回复
-
上海交大招收材料化学方向科研助理/“申请考核”博士（请勿回复帖子或站内投条）
已经有4人回复
-
Nature 11日发文，中国著名学者们称造假迫不得已
已经有5人回复
10