| 查看: 443 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者liaowangna将赠送您 70 个金币 | |||
liaowangna新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
求助如何回复审稿人提出的晶体学意见
|
||
|
投了一篇Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry，审稿人提了两个专业的问题，求助各位大牛，该如何回复，谢谢。 （1）I am puzzled by the displacement parameters in the two structures. The data collection temperature was 100 K, but even so the adps seem tiny. In fact for the triclinic structure, refinement with Shelxl rather than olex.refine causes the O-atom to become non-positive definite. I notice that very tight ISOR restraints were applied to the refinement, though this isn't mentioned in the experimental section and such high weights can not be physically reasonable. ISOR 0.001 0.002 $C $N $O $F ISOR 0.0001 0.0002 S1 （2）Both structures were determined using Cu-K\a radiation and since they contain iodine, absorption was fierce. I suspect that the multiscan corrections applied are not quite up to the job, and preliminary face indexed corrections might be a good idea for both structures. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有34人回复
-
心脉受损
已经有8人回复
-
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利，现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈？
已经有9人回复
-
博士申请都是内定的吗？
已经有8人回复
-
读博
已经有5人回复
-
投稿精细化工
已经有4人回复
-
导师想让我从独立一作变成了共一第一
已经有9人回复
-
Springer期刊投稿求助
已经有4人回复
