| 查看: 463 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者liaowangna将赠送您 70 个金币 | |||
liaowangna新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
求助如何回复审稿人提出的晶体学意见
|
||
|
投了一篇Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry，审稿人提了两个专业的问题，求助各位大牛，该如何回复，谢谢。 （1）I am puzzled by the displacement parameters in the two structures. The data collection temperature was 100 K, but even so the adps seem tiny. In fact for the triclinic structure, refinement with Shelxl rather than olex.refine causes the O-atom to become non-positive definite. I notice that very tight ISOR restraints were applied to the refinement, though this isn't mentioned in the experimental section and such high weights can not be physically reasonable. ISOR 0.001 0.002 $C $N $O $F ISOR 0.0001 0.0002 S1 （2）Both structures were determined using Cu-K\a radiation and since they contain iodine, absorption was fierce. I suspect that the multiscan corrections applied are not quite up to the job, and preliminary face indexed corrections might be a good idea for both structures. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
一志愿北京化工大学材料与化工296分求调剂
已经有17人回复
-
0703化学一志愿211 总分320求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
0703求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
（081700）化学工程与技术-298分求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
一志愿天津大学材料与化工275求调剂
已经有22人回复
-
0857 资源与环境 285分
已经有6人回复
-
材料工程,326分，求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
301求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
334求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
材料与化工085600调剂求老师收留
已经有5人回复
10