| 查看: 514 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者liaowangna将赠送您 70 个金币 | ||
liaowangna新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
求助如何回复审稿人提出的晶体学意见
|
|
|
投了一篇Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry，审稿人提了两个专业的问题，求助各位大牛，该如何回复，谢谢。 （1）I am puzzled by the displacement parameters in the two structures. The data collection temperature was 100 K, but even so the adps seem tiny. In fact for the triclinic structure, refinement with Shelxl rather than olex.refine causes the O-atom to become non-positive definite. I notice that very tight ISOR restraints were applied to the refinement, though this isn't mentioned in the experimental section and such high weights can not be physically reasonable. ISOR 0.001 0.002 $C $N $O $F ISOR 0.0001 0.0002 S1 （2）Both structures were determined using Cu-K\a radiation and since they contain iodine, absorption was fierce. I suspect that the multiscan corrections applied are not quite up to the job, and preliminary face indexed corrections might be a good idea for both structures. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
微信指数没变化，科研之友没阅读
已经有4人回复
-
这种情况还有戏吗
已经有9人回复
-
同事接到电话了，我却没有
已经有4人回复
-
准备明年的基金了
已经有5人回复
-
今年的WR进展到哪一步了？
已经有6人回复
-
时间戳他又来了
已经有11人回复
-
小木虫看见有人已经知道结果了
已经有15人回复
-
这个自发加氧反应的机理是什么？
已经有6人回复
-
J-J-W不为人知的一面
已经有18人回复
-
没消息就是被刷了呗
已经有13人回复
