| 查看: 486 | 回复: 0 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者liaowangna将赠送您 70 个金币 | ||
liaowangna新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
求助如何回复审稿人提出的晶体学意见
|
|
|
投了一篇Acta Crystallographica Section C: Structural Chemistry，审稿人提了两个专业的问题，求助各位大牛，该如何回复，谢谢。 （1）I am puzzled by the displacement parameters in the two structures. The data collection temperature was 100 K, but even so the adps seem tiny. In fact for the triclinic structure, refinement with Shelxl rather than olex.refine causes the O-atom to become non-positive definite. I notice that very tight ISOR restraints were applied to the refinement, though this isn't mentioned in the experimental section and such high weights can not be physically reasonable. ISOR 0.001 0.002 $C $N $O $F ISOR 0.0001 0.0002 S1 （2）Both structures were determined using Cu-K\a radiation and since they contain iodine, absorption was fierce. I suspect that the multiscan corrections applied are not quite up to the job, and preliminary face indexed corrections might be a good idea for both structures. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
云南大学材料与能源学院解琳课题组钙钛矿博士招生
已经有6人回复
-
反应很差，大量原料没有反应
已经有8人回复
-
面上本子正文33页，违规吗？会被低分嘛？
已经有13人回复
-
评审有感
已经有23人回复
-
提交了我也来说说感想
已经有6人回复
-
Sci. Bull. 悲剧经验
已经有7人回复
-
今年审到国自然15份，谈谈感受
已经有20人回复
-
国自然评分
已经有4人回复
-
如果工作了想读博，可以边工作边读全日制嘛？
已经有5人回复
-
如何实现卤原子转化
已经有8人回复
5