24小时热门版块排行榜    

北京石油化工学院2026年研究生招生接收调剂公告
查看: 513  |  回复: 8
当前主题已经存档。
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

maad

木虫 (小有名气)

[交流] 【求助完毕】帮忙翻译一个审稿意见,谢谢,2009-9-20截止(5个金币求助)

这是大修回来的意见:
While the authors have done a reasonable job in terms of correcting obvious mistakes in their previous manuscript, I still cannot see that this manuscript adds nothing new. The conclusions are not backed by the simulation data. Admittedly, the conclusion that Y is a more dominant determinant than T is most likely true, yet, it's unwarranted by the authors data, which contrasts related studies of independent groups. Unfortunately, the analysis presented by the authors is not put in the appropriate perspective given these closely related studies.  The authors should also read the literature more carefully, e.g., there are plenty of publications that ......, moreover, a number of references are misquoted, and some are not quoted appropriately.

其实主要目的不是为了翻译,所以才把一段意见都贴了出来,只是为了理解关键的一两句话。主要疑问是这句:
which contrasts related studies of independent groups
是说我们的工作仅仅对比了独立几组,还是我们引用文献的时候只对比了独立的几组文献,还是别的什么意思?麻烦各位看一下前后文,给个答复,谢谢了哦

[ Last edited by qingshaojun0823 on 2009-9-24 at 09:24 ]

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zxyan

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)


linghanyuan(金币+1,VIP+0):谢谢交流 9-12 15:10
I still cannot see that this manuscript adds nothing new.(审稿人希望有你自己的数据和观点!);The conclusions are not backed by the simulation data.(从模拟数据给出结果或建立两者之间联系!); the analysis presented by the authors is not put in the appropriate perspective given these closely related studies.(审稿人不客气地告诉你认真将自己的稿子按逻辑关系过一遍!)个人见解,供参考!语气不够委婉。
5楼2009-09-11 17:47:26
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 9 个回答

jw227

木虫 (著名写手)

课题组长

★ ★
polymerpark(金币+1,VIP+0):谢谢参与 9-11 16:33
linghanyuan(金币+1,VIP+0):谢谢交流 9-12 15:10
说的是:审稿人对比其他文献中的研究,得出你的数据不支持你的结论这个观点,建议你这次好好修改,否则有被拒的可能
我是来消遣的
2楼2009-09-11 10:41:01
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wangwei2008

木虫 (职业作家)

小木虫之移花宫主


polymerpark(金币+1,VIP+0):谢谢参与 9-11 16:33
我的理解是   引用文献的时候只对比了独立的几组文献,无法证明你的研究结论。
3楼2009-09-11 11:49:02
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

maad

木虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
Originally posted by wangwei2008 at 2009-9-11 11:49:
我的理解是   引用文献的时候只对比了独立的几组文献,无法证明你的研究结论。

我们的初步判断也是这样的,谢谢你的讨论
4楼2009-09-11 12:31:06
已阅   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 332求调剂 +8 小小孟... 2026-04-05 8/400 2026-04-05 09:41 by lbsjt
[考研] 283分求调剂 +7 试试看呗 2026-04-04 7/350 2026-04-05 09:32 by guoweigw
[考研] 346分的生物与医药08600求调剂 +3 常雨阳上岸 2026-04-05 4/200 2026-04-05 07:52 by kang123k
[考研] 323分(计算机视觉和大模型项目)能直接上手 +3 chaoxiicy 2026-04-01 3/150 2026-04-05 00:50 by chongya
[考研] 311分 22408 求调剂 +3 bing_bot 2026-04-03 3/150 2026-04-05 00:43 by chongya
[考研] 材料与化工306分找调剂 +23 沧海轻舟e 2026-04-02 27/1350 2026-04-04 21:52 by laoshidan
[考研] 土木304求调剂 +4 兔突突突, 2026-03-31 4/200 2026-04-04 13:34 by 1753564080
[考研] 297求调剂 +11 ljy20040718! 2026-04-03 13/650 2026-04-04 09:23 by 来看流星雨10
[考研] 387求调剂 +4 爱吃片豆土 2026-04-03 5/250 2026-04-04 08:10 by 岸上的一条鱼
[考研] 化工调剂303分,过四级 +28 栖梧待风 2026-04-02 28/1400 2026-04-03 21:40 by qlm5820
[考研] 295求调剂 +6 FZAC123 2026-04-03 6/300 2026-04-03 21:01 by zhq0425
[考研] 070300一志愿211,312分求调剂院校 +16 小黄鸭宝 2026-03-30 16/800 2026-04-03 19:53 by lijunpoly
[考研] 求调剂不挑专业 +3 xrh030412 2026-04-01 3/150 2026-04-03 14:40 by 氮气气气
[考研] 085501一志愿天工大,机械专硕求调剂,跨材料 +3 33上 2026-04-03 3/150 2026-04-03 14:08 by 1753564080
[考研] 285求调剂 +8 AZMK 2026-04-02 11/550 2026-04-02 20:16 by yulian1987
[考研] 301求调剂 +4 细胞相关蛋白 2026-04-02 8/400 2026-04-02 16:30 by 271179835
[考研] 0710生物学求调剂 +9 manman511 2026-04-01 9/450 2026-04-02 10:00 by zxl830724
[考研] 307分求调剂 +14 (o~o) 2026-03-31 15/750 2026-04-01 20:43 by longlotian
[考研] 本2一志愿C9-333分,材料科学与工程,求调剂 +9 升升不降 2026-03-31 9/450 2026-03-31 18:01 by 无际的草原
[考研] 一志愿中海洋320化学工程与技术学硕求调剂 +8 披星河 2026-03-30 8/400 2026-03-31 08:53 by lbsjt
信息提示
请填处理意见