24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前主题已经存档。

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

maad

木虫 (小有名气)

应助: 6 (幼儿园)
金币: 1649.2
散金: 769
红花: 9
帖子: 245
在线: 470小时
虫号: 565636
注册: 2008-05-29
专业: 膜生物化学与膜生物物理学

[交流] 【求助完毕】帮忙翻译一个审稿意见，谢谢，2009-9-20截止（5个金币求助）

这是大修回来的意见：
While the authors have done a reasonable job in terms of correcting obvious mistakes in their previous manuscript, I still cannot see that this manuscript adds nothing new. The conclusions are not backed by the simulation data. Admittedly, the conclusion that Y is a more dominant determinant than T is most likely true, yet, it's unwarranted by the authors data, which contrasts related studies of independent groups. Unfortunately, the analysis presented by the authors is not put in the appropriate perspective given these closely related studies. The authors should also read the literature more carefully, e.g., there are plenty of publications that ......, moreover, a number of references are misquoted, and some are not quoted appropriately.

其实主要目的不是为了翻译，所以才把一段意见都贴了出来，只是为了理解关键的一两句话。主要疑问是这句：
which contrasts related studies of independent groups
是说我们的工作仅仅对比了独立几组，还是我们引用文献的时候只对比了独立的几组文献，还是别的什么意思？麻烦各位看一下前后文，给个答复，谢谢了哦

[ Last edited by qingshaojun0823 on 2009-9-24 at 09:24 ]

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

1楼 2009-09-11 10:07:51

已阅关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

zxyan

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

应助: 56 (初中生)
金币: 21128.1
散金: 2151
红花: 6
沙发: 2
帖子: 18284
在线: 881.4小时
虫号: 818017
注册: 2009-07-29
专业: 燃烧学

★
linghanyuan(金币+1,VIP+0):谢谢交流 9-12 15:10

I still cannot see that this manuscript adds nothing new.（审稿人希望有你自己的数据和观点！）；The conclusions are not backed by the simulation data.（从模拟数据给出结果或建立两者之间联系！）； the analysis presented by the authors is not put in the appropriate perspective given these closely related studies.（审稿人不客气地告诉你认真将自己的稿子按逻辑关系过一遍！）个人见解，供参考！语气不够委婉。