| 查看: 1366 | 回复: 23 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
al19851986金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
文章大修
|
||
|
7月24日投稿，8月31返回三个审稿人意见，编辑大修 Reviewer #1: 1. English should be improved by a native speaker. 2. Units should be normalise according to journal. 3. Vendor information must be given consistently and completely: e.g. Sigma (St. Loius, MO, USA); Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Once the location of a supplier has been mentioned, it need not be repeated. 4. 5. Some informations should be given in Figure and Table legends about experimental conditions. Reviewer #2: 1.The novelty of the paper is poor. 2.The scientific knowledge in the particular area is poor. 3.The results and discussion scientifically are not sound. 4.The real samples (pool water) should be analysed previously by a conventional method 5. 6. Reviewer #3: A new method after cloud point extraction was described. The subject of the paper is interesting and important. 1. 2. In my opinion authors should show results in Table 2-4 more precisely, especially in the case of recovery data (sometimes above 100%, is it correct? Why?) 文章创新性不高这不好改啊？ 另外还有最后一条，分析上回收率超过100%是很正常啊，也不晓得怎么解释？  [ Last edited by al19851986 on 2009-9-2 at 21:06 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
290调剂生物0860
已经有32人回复
-
271求调剂
已经有28人回复
-
105500药学求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
274求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
335求调剂
已经有20人回复
-
化工学硕294分，求导师收留
已经有33人回复
-
290求调剂
已经有22人回复
-
291 求调剂
已经有36人回复
-
食品与营养（0955）271求调剂
已经有16人回复
-
22408 312求调剂
已经有10人回复
liujunhero
新虫 (文学泰斗)
- 应助: 496 (硕士)
- 贵宾: 1.109
- 金币: 216791
- 散金: 2000
- 红花: 244
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 92937
- 在线: 1579小时
- 虫号: 480354
- 注册: 2007-12-15
- 专业: 食品科学
9楼2009-09-01 15:48:08
simitsoi
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.01
- 金币: 6164.4
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 2860
- 在线: 437小时
- 虫号: 526915
- 注册: 2008-03-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 半导体晶体与薄膜材料
2楼2009-09-01 14:11:18
3楼2009-09-01 14:15:43
yspaznkl
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 262.4
- 散金: 800
- 帖子: 323
- 在线: 196.4小时
- 虫号: 757982
- 注册: 2009-04-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 偏微分方程
4楼2009-09-01 14:16:52
5