| ²é¿´: 1369 | »Ø¸´: 23 | ||||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | ||||
| µ±Ç°Ö»ÏÔʾÂú×ãÖ¸¶¨Ìõ¼þµÄ»ØÌû£¬µã»÷ÕâÀï²é¿´±¾»°ÌâµÄËùÓлØÌû | ||||
al19851986½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
ÎÄÕ´óÐÞ
|
|||
|
7ÔÂ24ÈÕͶ¸å£¬8ÔÂ31·µ»ØÈý¸öÉó¸åÈËÒâ¼û£¬±à¼´óÐÞ Reviewer #1: 1. English should be improved by a native speaker. 2. Units should be normalise according to journal. 3. Vendor information must be given consistently and completely: e.g. Sigma (St. Loius, MO, USA); Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Once the location of a supplier has been mentioned, it need not be repeated. 4. 5. Some informations should be given in Figure and Table legends about experimental conditions. Reviewer #2: 1.The novelty of the paper is poor. 2.The scientific knowledge in the particular area is poor. 3.The results and discussion scientifically are not sound. 4.The real samples (pool water) should be analysed previously by a conventional method 5. 6. Reviewer #3: A new method after cloud point extraction was described. The subject of the paper is interesting and important. 1. 2. In my opinion authors should show results in Table 2-4 more precisely, especially in the case of recovery data (sometimes above 100%, is it correct? Why?) ÎÄÕ´´ÐÂÐÔ²»¸ßÕâ²»ºÃ¸Ä°¡£¿ ÁíÍ⻹ÓÐ×îºóÒ»Ìõ£¬·ÖÎöÉÏ»ØÊÕÂʳ¬¹ý100%ÊǺÜÕý³£°¡£¬Ò²²»ÏþµÃÔõô½âÊÍ£¿ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() [ Last edited by al19851986 on 2009-9-2 at 21:06 ] |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖÐũҵ071010£¬320Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ҩѧÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼ÁÍÆ¼ö
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
290µ÷¼ÁÉúÎï0860
ÒѾÓÐ40È˻ظ´
085400µç×ÓÐÅÏ¢Àࣨ´¨´ó¿ØÖƹ¤³Ì£©Çóµ÷¼Á¿É¿çרҵ ÇóÀÏʦÁªÏµ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϹ¤³Ì281»¹Óе÷¼Á»ú»áÂð
ÒѾÓÐ42È˻ظ´
273Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
ҩѧ305Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼ÁѧУ
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
ɽ¶«Ê¡»ù½ð2026
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´

¡ï
al19851986(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл£¡ 9-1 15:10
al19851986(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл£¡ 9-1 15:10
|
ÕâÖÖ¾ßÌåÎÊÌâÄãÓ¦¸Ã×øÏÂÀ´ºÍÄ㵼ʦºÃºÃÌÖÂÛÌÖÂÛ£¬ ¹ØÓÚ´´ÐÂÐԵȣ¬¶àÈ¥²é²éÎÄÏס£ Õâ¸öµØ·½¿ÉÒÔ¸øÄã¹ÄÀø£¬¸øÄãһЩͶ¸å·½Ãæ´óµÄ¡°¸Ð¾õʽ¡±¾Ñé¡£ ¾ßÌåµÄÊÂÇ飬»¹µÃ×Ô¼º»¨Á¦ÆøÈ¥Åª¡£ good luck~ |
3Â¥2009-09-01 14:15:43
simitsoi
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 8 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.01
- ½ð±Ò: 6164.4
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 2860
- ÔÚÏß: 437Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 526915
- ×¢²á: 2008-03-17
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: °ëµ¼Ìå¾§ÌåÓ뱡Ĥ²ÄÁÏ
¡ï
al19851986(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл£¡ 9-1 14:15
al19851986(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):лл£¡ 9-1 14:15
|
ºÃºÃ¸Ä°É£¬¸Ä¾ÍÓлú»á £¡ ÊÇÔڻرܲ»Á˵ģ¬ÄǾÍÇ¿µ÷×Ô¼ºµÄ¹¤×÷¾ÍÐУ¡ |
2Â¥2009-09-01 14:11:18
yspaznkl
½ð³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 2 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 262.4
- É¢½ð: 800
- Ìû×Ó: 323
- ÔÚÏß: 196.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 757982
- ×¢²á: 2009-04-26
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ƫ΢·Ö·½³Ì
¡ï
al19851986(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):ÎÒÌý±ðÈË˵£¬²î²»¶à¸ÄÍêºó»¹ÊÇË͸øµÚ¶þ¸ö 9-1 15:11
al19851986(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):ÎÒÌý±ðÈË˵£¬²î²»¶à¸ÄÍêºó»¹ÊÇË͸øµÚ¶þ¸ö 9-1 15:11
|
ÕâÖÖÆÀÂ۱༸øÄã¸ÄµÄ»ú»á£¬ËµÃ÷±à¼ºÜÈÊ´ÈÁË ºÃºÃ°ÑÎÕ»ú»á£¬¶ÔÎÄÕ³¹µ×´óÐÞ£¬»¹ÊÇÓÐÏ£ÍûµÄ ²»¹ýÈç¹ûÔÚËÍÉó¸øreviewer 2,¿ÖÅÂÏ£ÍûÒ²²»´ó |
4Â¥2009-09-01 14:16:52
nono2009
³¬¼¶°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
No gains, no pains.
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 28684 (Ժʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 513.911
- ½ð±Ò: 2555230
- É¢½ð: 27828
- ºì»¨: 2148
- ɳ·¢: 66666
- Ìû×Ó: 1602255
- ÔÚÏß: 65200.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 827383
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÓëÄÜÔ´ÀûÓÃ
- ¹ÜϽ: ¿ÆÑмҳﱸίԱ»á
¡ï
al19851986(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):3q 9-1 15:12
al19851986(½ð±Ò+1,VIP+0):3q 9-1 15:12
| The editor intended to give another chance. Better revise it carefully. Regarding the novelty, you'd better emphasize on the difference between your work and the others. |
5Â¥2009-09-01 14:29:36















»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥