| 查看: 1371 | 回复: 23 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
al19851986金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
文章大修
|
||
|
7月24日投稿，8月31返回三个审稿人意见，编辑大修 Reviewer #1: 1. English should be improved by a native speaker. 2. Units should be normalise according to journal. 3. Vendor information must be given consistently and completely: e.g. Sigma (St. Loius, MO, USA); Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Once the location of a supplier has been mentioned, it need not be repeated. 4. 5. Some informations should be given in Figure and Table legends about experimental conditions. Reviewer #2: 1.The novelty of the paper is poor. 2.The scientific knowledge in the particular area is poor. 3.The results and discussion scientifically are not sound. 4.The real samples (pool water) should be analysed previously by a conventional method 5. 6. Reviewer #3: A new method after cloud point extraction was described. The subject of the paper is interesting and important. 1. 2. In my opinion authors should show results in Table 2-4 more precisely, especially in the case of recovery data (sometimes above 100%, is it correct? Why?) 文章创新性不高这不好改啊？ 另外还有最后一条，分析上回收率超过100%是很正常啊，也不晓得怎么解释？  [ Last edited by al19851986 on 2009-9-2 at 21:06 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
291分调剂
已经有9人回复
-
调剂求收留
已经有34人回复
-
291 求调剂
已经有38人回复
-
22408 312求调剂
已经有17人回复
-
一志愿华中农业071010，320求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
290调剂生物0860
已经有41人回复
-
291求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
211本科材料化工求调剂
已经有23人回复
-
山东省基金2026
已经有9人回复
-
药学求调剂
已经有13人回复
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
5楼2009-09-01 14:29:36
simitsoi
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.01
- 金币: 6164.4
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 2860
- 在线: 437小时
- 虫号: 526915
- 注册: 2008-03-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 半导体晶体与薄膜材料
2楼2009-09-01 14:11:18
3楼2009-09-01 14:15:43
yspaznkl
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 262.4
- 散金: 800
- 帖子: 323
- 在线: 196.4小时
- 虫号: 757982
- 注册: 2009-04-26
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 偏微分方程
4楼2009-09-01 14:16:52
10