| 查看: 1315 | 回复: 23 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
al19851986金虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
文章大修
|
||
|
7月24日投稿，8月31返回三个审稿人意见，编辑大修 Reviewer #1: 1. English should be improved by a native speaker. 2. Units should be normalise according to journal. 3. Vendor information must be given consistently and completely: e.g. Sigma (St. Loius, MO, USA); Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Once the location of a supplier has been mentioned, it need not be repeated. 4. 5. Some informations should be given in Figure and Table legends about experimental conditions. Reviewer #2: 1.The novelty of the paper is poor. 2.The scientific knowledge in the particular area is poor. 3.The results and discussion scientifically are not sound. 4.The real samples (pool water) should be analysed previously by a conventional method 5. 6. Reviewer #3: A new method after cloud point extraction was described. The subject of the paper is interesting and important. 1. 2. In my opinion authors should show results in Table 2-4 more precisely, especially in the case of recovery data (sometimes above 100%, is it correct? Why?) 文章创新性不高这不好改啊？ 另外还有最后一条，分析上回收率超过100%是很正常啊，也不晓得怎么解释？  [ Last edited by al19851986 on 2009-9-2 at 21:06 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
谈谈两天一夜的“延安行”
已经有15人回复
-
EST投稿状态问题
已经有6人回复
-
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有15人回复
-
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有11人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的Neoplasia杂志，到最后选publishing options时页面空白，不能完成投稿
已经有16人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有4人回复
-
聘U V热熔胶研究人员
已经有10人回复
-
求助文献
已经有3人回复
-
投稿返修后收到这样的回复，还有希望吗
已经有8人回复
-
三无产品还有机会吗
已经有6人回复
al19851986
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 978.1
- 帖子: 546
- 在线:
- 虫号: 470471
- 注册: 2007-11-29
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 化学计量学与化学信息学
simitsoi
铁杆木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 8 (幼儿园)
- 贵宾: 0.01
- 金币: 6164.4
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 2860
- 在线: 437小时
- 虫号: 526915
- 注册: 2008-03-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 半导体晶体与薄膜材料