| ²é¿´: 178 | »Ø¸´: 3 | ||||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | ||||
cherryjing1786Ìú³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
ÇëÎÊÕâÑù×ö¿ÉÒÔÂð
|
|||
|
ÊÂÇéÊÇÕâÑùµÄ ÎÒ·¢ÏÖÁ½ÆªÎÄÕ£¨¿¯ÔÚͬһ¸öÆÚ¿¯ÉÏ£©ÓÐͬһ¸öÐÔÖʵÄ©¶´ ÓÚÊÇдÁËÆªÎÄÕÂÖ¸³öÀ´£¬Í¶ÁËÒ»¸öletters£¬¾ÜÁË£¬Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÈçÏ£º Reviewers' comments: This paper attacks two protocols that are clearly weak: they should never have been published. It would thus be more appropriate to submit this paper to the same place as the broken schemes. ÇëÎÊÎÒÒªÊǰ´ÕÕÉó¸åÈ˵Ľ¨ÒéͶµ½ÄǸö¿¯³ö´íÎóÎÄÕÂµÄÆÚ¿¯£¬ÄÜÖÐÂð£¿Òª²»Òª°ÑÕâ´ÎµÄÒâ¼û¸æËßÄǸöÆÚ¿¯ÄØ£¿ÕâÑù×ö¶ÔÎÄÕ¼ÓÃÊÇÓаïÖú»¹ÊÇÓиºÃæÓ°ÏìÄØ?Çë¸ßÈËÖ¸½Ì£¡²»Éõ¸Ð¼¤£¡ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
322Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
295·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
294Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
±¾ÈËÅ®º¢
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
¶þ±½¼×ͪËáÀàÑÜÉúÎï
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öпƴó²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤£¬353·Ö»¹Óе÷¼ÁѧУÂð
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
335Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
279Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
271Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ39È˻ظ´
nono2009
³¬¼¶°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
No gains, no pains.
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 28684 (Ժʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 513.911
- ½ð±Ò: 2555230
- É¢½ð: 27828
- ºì»¨: 2148
- ɳ·¢: 66666
- Ìû×Ó: 1602255
- ÔÚÏß: 65200.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 827383
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÓëÄÜÔ´ÀûÓÃ
- ¹ÜϽ: ¿ÆÑмҳﱸίԱ»á
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
Usually, you should submit your comments to the same journal of those two questionable papers. But before you do it, you'd better check if that journal accepted this kind of comment before. |
2Â¥2009-08-27 20:34:48
cherryjing1786
Ìú³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 13 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 271.7
- É¢½ð: 7
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 813
- ÔÚÏß: 197.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 692456
- ×¢²á: 2009-01-14
- רҵ: ÐÅÏ¢°²È«
3Â¥2009-08-27 20:40:54
cherryjing1786
Ìú³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 13 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 271.7
- É¢½ð: 7
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 813
- ÔÚÏß: 197.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 692456
- ×¢²á: 2009-01-14
- רҵ: ÐÅÏ¢°²È«
4Â¥2009-08-27 21:51:17













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥