| ²é¿´: 174 | »Ø¸´: 3 | ||||
| µ±Ç°Ö÷ÌâÒѾ´æµµ¡£ | ||||
cherryjing1786Ìú³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
|
[½»Á÷]
ÇëÎÊÕâÑù×ö¿ÉÒÔÂð
|
|||
|
ÊÂÇéÊÇÕâÑùµÄ ÎÒ·¢ÏÖÁ½ÆªÎÄÕ£¨¿¯ÔÚͬһ¸öÆÚ¿¯ÉÏ£©ÓÐͬһ¸öÐÔÖʵÄ©¶´ ÓÚÊÇдÁËÆªÎÄÕÂÖ¸³öÀ´£¬Í¶ÁËÒ»¸öletters£¬¾ÜÁË£¬Éó¸åÒâ¼ûÈçÏ£º Reviewers' comments: This paper attacks two protocols that are clearly weak: they should never have been published. It would thus be more appropriate to submit this paper to the same place as the broken schemes. ÇëÎÊÎÒÒªÊǰ´ÕÕÉó¸åÈ˵Ľ¨ÒéͶµ½ÄǸö¿¯³ö´íÎóÎÄÕÂµÄÆÚ¿¯£¬ÄÜÖÐÂð£¿Òª²»Òª°ÑÕâ´ÎµÄÒâ¼û¸æËßÄǸöÆÚ¿¯ÄØ£¿ÕâÑù×ö¶ÔÎÄÕ¼ÓÃÊÇÓаïÖú»¹ÊÇÓиºÃæÓ°ÏìÄØ?Çë¸ßÈËÖ¸½Ì£¡²»Éõ¸Ð¼¤£¡ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
291·Öµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
µ÷¼ÁÇóÊÕÁô
ÒѾÓÐ34È˻ظ´
291 Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ38È˻ظ´
22408 312Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ17È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸»ªÖÐũҵ071010£¬320Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
290µ÷¼ÁÉúÎï0860
ÒѾÓÐ41È˻ظ´
291Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
211±¾¿Æ²ÄÁÏ»¯¹¤Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ23È˻ظ´
ɽ¶«Ê¡»ù½ð2026
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
ҩѧÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
nono2009
³¬¼¶°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
No gains, no pains.
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 28684 (Ժʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 513.911
- ½ð±Ò: 2555230
- É¢½ð: 27828
- ºì»¨: 2148
- ɳ·¢: 66666
- Ìû×Ó: 1602255
- ÔÚÏß: 65200.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 827383
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÓëÄÜÔ´ÀûÓÃ
- ¹ÜϽ: ¿ÆÑмҳﱸίԱ»á
¡ï
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
Сľ³æ(½ð±Ò+0.5):¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû½»Á÷
|
Usually, you should submit your comments to the same journal of those two questionable papers. But before you do it, you'd better check if that journal accepted this kind of comment before. |
2Â¥2009-08-27 20:34:48
cherryjing1786
Ìú³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 13 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 271.7
- É¢½ð: 7
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 813
- ÔÚÏß: 197.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 692456
- ×¢²á: 2009-01-14
- רҵ: ÐÅÏ¢°²È«
3Â¥2009-08-27 20:40:54
cherryjing1786
Ìú³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 13 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 271.7
- É¢½ð: 7
- ºì»¨: 1
- Ìû×Ó: 813
- ÔÚÏß: 197.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 692456
- ×¢²á: 2009-01-14
- רҵ: ÐÅÏ¢°²È«
4Â¥2009-08-27 21:51:17














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥