24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (4363)
>休闲灌水 (440)
>虫友互识 (379)
>导师招生 (292)
>文献求助 (259)
>博后之家 (168)
>论文投稿 (145)
>招聘信息布告栏 (128)
>硕博家园 (61)
>学术会议 (50)
>考博 (44)
>基金申请 (36)
>育儿交流 (32)
>教师之家 (32)
>有机交流 (27)
>找工作 (26)

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者xuxuxuxujing将赠送您 10 个金币

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

xuxuxuxujing

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 9
散金: 10
帖子: 21
在线: 11.3小时
虫号: 23347972
注册: 2020-08-09
专业: 控制理论与方法

[求助] 收到SCI的审稿意见，但是真的不知道该怎么修改啊

1-The objective, methodology, and results should be better described, discussed and justified.
2- The current literature review is not sufficient and research gap is not clear.
3- The results should be expanded significantly and quantitatively.
4- I strongly suggest that authors shall carry out more studies to compare the results from this paper to that from other similar studies.
5- Add numerical results in the abstract.
6-Moreover, try to enhance the explanation of the paper equation by the physical point of view (not only the symbols and the units). Furthermore, provide references for the selected equations where it is possible.
收到SCI的审稿意见，但是真的不知道该怎么修改啊，特别是第一条，太泛了吧，感觉是不是想要拒

回复此楼