24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 738  |  回复: 12
当前主题已经存档。

richards

铁虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 请问这个算小修吗?希望大不大?

Dear XXX,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper and, for your guidance, we have appended their comments below.  You will see they are advising that you revise your manuscript.  If you are prepared to undertake the work required, we would be pleased to reconsider your manuscript for publication.


Reviewers' comments:


Reviewer #1: Key: 1,2 = Page 1, Line 2

This paper is a first revision of an earlier submission. This paper reports on the application of a classification algorithm to normal and pathological voice acoustic data contained within the Kay Elemetrics database of MEEI.

The background of this work are papers published in the IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (TBME), noted as Reference [12] and [20] in the current submission. These papers and the current authors use identical samples from the MEEI database.

The classification improvement is marginal. Typically, minor improvements to classification are reported in a "Short communication" or "Letters" article within the journal of context, which in this case is IEEE TBME, rather than a full article in a separate journal.

The paper makes many claims that require substantiation or context. Often this can be accomplished by simply providing a reference; in other cases, the claim may need modified or removed. As some examples:

1,38: "Voice diseases have been increasing rapidly due to environmental pollution and unhealthy voice habits."

1,43: "[Laryngoscopy] causes pain and discomfort to the patient."

The entire paper should be carefully examined by the authors in this regard.

2,42: The section is titled: "Speech Data and Feature Extraction" What "feature extraction"?

2,46: sustained vowel /a/ rather than /ah/

2, 49: Should this be 'Kay' databases rather than 'Key'? See also 9,18.

2,51: ".down sampled to 25 kHz for the purpose of this study." Was downsampling performed with or without filtering??

6,22: Should be "In (14),." rather than "In (11)"

Table 3: Omit "Gold Standard"

7,47: Only a pathologist or qualified clinician should diagnose disease. Refer to the results as "machine classification", or some such.

The first two paragraphs of "Discussion and Conclusions" are actually "Results" for the most part.

8,50: The claim "GMM supervectors.are efficient features for the discrimination of normal and pathological voices" should be re-stated. Perhaps the authors mean to say "effective". Efficiency would have to do with the compactness and/or speed of the classification. I suggest "largely effective", since errors remain. See also 9,39.
9,201: "white point"

The References are incomplete. As one example, see [18], where only the year of publication is provided. Ditto for [1], [2], and many others.


Reviewer #2: The revision is much better than the original manuscript.  It is easier to read and flows nicely.  The abstract needs to be edited for grammar.

麻烦高手帮看看,多谢了!
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liujunhero

新虫 (文学泰斗)

文献杰出贡献文献杰出贡献


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
希望很大的啊,恭喜楼主了啊,只要按要求修改就好了
2楼2009-07-28 16:05:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bringlee

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
小修吧,主要是语法,认真修改
3楼2009-07-28 16:05:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ddup885

银虫 (正式写手)


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
好好修改吧,语法是小问题哦
4楼2009-07-28 16:09:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

naiwohe

金虫 (正式写手)


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
小修
5楼2009-07-28 16:12:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

commonman

金虫 (正式写手)


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
肯定没问题的,提前恭喜了
6楼2009-07-28 16:13:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

youyongdeyu868

木虫 (正式写手)


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
真羡慕,小修,语法再润润就好了,提前祝贺
7楼2009-07-28 16:45:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

杈杈

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

Everyone is the No. one!

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
没啥原则性问题,按照要求认真修改就OK了!

CONGRATULATIONS!
望乡——乡归梦思;思念——念往何望
8楼2009-07-28 16:48:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangweibao

木虫 (职业作家)

我心依旧


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
同喜同喜啊
命里有时终须有,命里无时莫强求
9楼2009-07-28 16:53:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ashen8212

木虫 (著名写手)


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
问题不大啊
试了不一定行,不试一定不行
10楼2009-07-28 16:58:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 richards 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 材料类求调剂 +10 wana_kiko 2026-02-28 11/550 2026-03-01 18:11 by 海嵙Y
[考研] 高分子化学与物理调剂 +6 好好好1233 2026-02-28 11/550 2026-03-01 17:47 by 好好好1233
[考研] 化工专硕348,一志愿985求调剂 +5 弗格个 2026-02-28 8/400 2026-03-01 17:25 by sunny81
[考研] 281求调剂 +4 2026计算机_诚心 2026-03-01 7/350 2026-03-01 17:20 by 2026计算机_诚心
[考研] 0856材料求调剂 +4 麻辣鱿鱼 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-03-01 16:51 by caszguilin
[考研] 化工专硕342,一志愿大连理工大学,求调剂 +3 kyf化工 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-03-01 16:49 by yywzz
[考研] 0805总分292,求调剂 +4 幻想之殇 2026-03-01 4/200 2026-03-01 16:47 by ms629
[考研] 313求调剂 +3 水流年lc 2026-02-28 3/150 2026-03-01 16:01 by 新能源达人
[考研] 311求调剂 +6 亭亭亭01 2026-03-01 6/300 2026-03-01 15:41 by 324616
[考研] 291分工科求调剂 +8 science饿饿 2026-03-01 9/450 2026-03-01 14:22 by Ducount.Y
[考研] 302材料工程求调剂 +4 Doleres 2026-03-01 5/250 2026-03-01 11:52 by liqiongjy
[考研] 272求调剂 +5 材紫有化 2026-02-28 5/250 2026-03-01 11:51 by gaoxiaoniuma
[考研] 317一志愿华南理工电气工程求调剂 +6 Soliloquy_Q 2026-02-28 11/550 2026-03-01 11:14 by 歌liekkas
[考研] 311求调剂 +9 南迦720 2026-02-28 10/500 2026-03-01 10:55 by sunny81
[考博] 博士自荐 +4 kkluvs 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-03-01 10:19 by 馥安馥安
[考研] 材料调剂 +4 爱擦汗的可乐冰 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-03-01 00:38 by 猫猫球alter
[考研] 085600材料工程一志愿中科大总分312求调剂 +8 吃宵夜1 2026-02-28 10/500 2026-02-28 20:27 by L135790
[考研] 276求调剂 +3 路lyh123 2026-02-28 4/200 2026-02-28 19:45 by 路lyh123
[考研] 0856材料求调剂 +10 hyf hyf hyf 2026-02-28 11/550 2026-02-28 18:50 by 无际的草原
[考研] 265分求调剂不调专业和学校有行学上就 +4 礼堂丁真258 2026-02-28 6/300 2026-02-28 16:18 by 求调剂zz
信息提示
请填处理意见