| 查看: 945 | 回复: 12 | |||
| 当前主题已经存档。 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
请问这个算小修吗?希望大不大？
|
|||
|
Dear XXX, Reviewers have now commented on your paper and, for your guidance, we have appended their comments below. You will see they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, we would be pleased to reconsider your manuscript for publication. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: Key: 1,2 = Page 1, Line 2 This paper is a first revision of an earlier submission. This paper reports on the application of a classification algorithm to normal and pathological voice acoustic data contained within the Kay Elemetrics database of MEEI. The background of this work are papers published in the IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (TBME), noted as Reference [12] and [20] in the current submission. These papers and the current authors use identical samples from the MEEI database. The classification improvement is marginal. Typically, minor improvements to classification are reported in a "Short communication" or "Letters" article within the journal of context, which in this case is IEEE TBME, rather than a full article in a separate journal. The paper makes many claims that require substantiation or context. Often this can be accomplished by simply providing a reference; in other cases, the claim may need modified or removed. As some examples: 1,38: "Voice diseases have been increasing rapidly due to environmental pollution and unhealthy voice habits." 1,43: "[Laryngoscopy] causes pain and discomfort to the patient." The entire paper should be carefully examined by the authors in this regard. 2,42: The section is titled: "Speech Data and Feature Extraction" What "feature extraction"? 2,46: sustained vowel /a/ rather than /ah/ 2, 49: Should this be 'Kay' databases rather than 'Key'? See also 9,18. 2,51: ".down sampled to 25 kHz for the purpose of this study." Was downsampling performed with or without filtering?? 6,22: Should be "In (14),." rather than "In (11)" Table 3: Omit "Gold Standard" 7,47: Only a pathologist or qualified clinician should diagnose disease. Refer to the results as "machine classification", or some such. The first two paragraphs of "Discussion and Conclusions" are actually "Results" for the most part. 8,50: The claim "GMM supervectors.are efficient features for the discrimination of normal and pathological voices" should be re-stated. Perhaps the authors mean to say "effective". Efficiency would have to do with the compactness and/or speed of the classification. I suggest "largely effective", since errors remain. See also 9,39. 9,201: "white point" The References are incomplete. As one example, see [18], where only the year of publication is provided. Ditto for [1], [2], and many others. Reviewer #2: The revision is much better than the original manuscript. It is easier to read and flows nicely. The abstract needs to be edited for grammar. 麻烦高手帮看看，多谢了！ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律
已经有25人回复
-
澳大利亚 Murdoch University 全奖博士招生（3个名额）地质化工冶金领域
已经有30人回复
-
咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否
已经有10人回复
-
小木虫上这么多卖论文的，真有人买论文么？感觉没必要啊
已经有10人回复
-
阿姨
已经有4人回复
-
一作与独作在应聘高校教师时区别大吗
已经有4人回复
-
静等基金结果
已经有21人回复
-
FileCode能看出啥？
已经有28人回复
-
有时候，自然基金真的不能太认真 （我的申报经验）
已经有6人回复
-
filecode
已经有16人回复
4楼2009-07-28 16:09:24
liujunhero
新虫 (文学泰斗)
- 应助: 496 (硕士)
- 贵宾: 1.109
- 金币: 216791
- 散金: 2000
- 红花: 244
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 92937
- 在线: 1579小时
- 虫号: 480354
- 注册: 2007-12-15
- 专业: 食品科学
2楼2009-07-28 16:05:09
bringlee
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 34415.2
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 6216
- 在线: 206.4小时
- 虫号: 276866
- 注册: 2006-09-03
- 专业: 碳素材料与超硬材料
3楼2009-07-28 16:05:31
commonman
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 4094.3
- 红花: 13
- 帖子: 617
- 在线: 225.8小时
- 虫号: 741555
- 注册: 2009-04-06
- 专业: 计算机网络
6楼2009-07-28 16:13:09
