24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 919  |  回复: 12
当前主题已经存档。

richards

铁虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 请问这个算小修吗?希望大不大?

Dear XXX,

Reviewers have now commented on your paper and, for your guidance, we have appended their comments below.  You will see they are advising that you revise your manuscript.  If you are prepared to undertake the work required, we would be pleased to reconsider your manuscript for publication.


Reviewers' comments:


Reviewer #1: Key: 1,2 = Page 1, Line 2

This paper is a first revision of an earlier submission. This paper reports on the application of a classification algorithm to normal and pathological voice acoustic data contained within the Kay Elemetrics database of MEEI.

The background of this work are papers published in the IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (TBME), noted as Reference [12] and [20] in the current submission. These papers and the current authors use identical samples from the MEEI database.

The classification improvement is marginal. Typically, minor improvements to classification are reported in a "Short communication" or "Letters" article within the journal of context, which in this case is IEEE TBME, rather than a full article in a separate journal.

The paper makes many claims that require substantiation or context. Often this can be accomplished by simply providing a reference; in other cases, the claim may need modified or removed. As some examples:

1,38: "Voice diseases have been increasing rapidly due to environmental pollution and unhealthy voice habits."

1,43: "[Laryngoscopy] causes pain and discomfort to the patient."

The entire paper should be carefully examined by the authors in this regard.

2,42: The section is titled: "Speech Data and Feature Extraction" What "feature extraction"?

2,46: sustained vowel /a/ rather than /ah/

2, 49: Should this be 'Kay' databases rather than 'Key'? See also 9,18.

2,51: ".down sampled to 25 kHz for the purpose of this study." Was downsampling performed with or without filtering??

6,22: Should be "In (14),." rather than "In (11)"

Table 3: Omit "Gold Standard"

7,47: Only a pathologist or qualified clinician should diagnose disease. Refer to the results as "machine classification", or some such.

The first two paragraphs of "Discussion and Conclusions" are actually "Results" for the most part.

8,50: The claim "GMM supervectors.are efficient features for the discrimination of normal and pathological voices" should be re-stated. Perhaps the authors mean to say "effective". Efficiency would have to do with the compactness and/or speed of the classification. I suggest "largely effective", since errors remain. See also 9,39.
9,201: "white point"

The References are incomplete. As one example, see [18], where only the year of publication is provided. Ditto for [1], [2], and many others.


Reviewer #2: The revision is much better than the original manuscript.  It is easier to read and flows nicely.  The abstract needs to be edited for grammar.

麻烦高手帮看看,多谢了!
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

liujunhero

新虫 (文学泰斗)

文献杰出贡献文献杰出贡献


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
希望很大的啊,恭喜楼主了啊,只要按要求修改就好了
2楼2009-07-28 16:05:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bringlee

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
小修吧,主要是语法,认真修改
3楼2009-07-28 16:05:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ddup885

银虫 (正式写手)


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
好好修改吧,语法是小问题哦
4楼2009-07-28 16:09:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

naiwohe

金虫 (正式写手)


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
小修
5楼2009-07-28 16:12:58
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

commonman

金虫 (正式写手)


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
肯定没问题的,提前恭喜了
6楼2009-07-28 16:13:09
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

youyongdeyu868

木虫 (正式写手)


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
真羡慕,小修,语法再润润就好了,提前祝贺
7楼2009-07-28 16:45:21
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

杈杈

荣誉版主 (文坛精英)

Everyone is the No. one!

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
没啥原则性问题,按照要求认真修改就OK了!

CONGRATULATIONS!
望乡——乡归梦思;思念——念往何望
8楼2009-07-28 16:48:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangweibao

木虫 (职业作家)

我心依旧


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
同喜同喜啊
命里有时终须有,命里无时莫强求
9楼2009-07-28 16:53:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ashen8212

木虫 (著名写手)


richards(金币+1):谢谢参与
问题不大啊
试了不一定行,不试一定不行
10楼2009-07-28 16:58:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 richards 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[硕博家园] 售SCI一区文章,我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急 +3 HEQlVqMTIA7d 2026-08-07 4/200 2026-08-08 04:07 by 6vVgjDL4CnGu
[基金申请] 售SCI-T0P文章,我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急 +3 KXLV3nuBVBY7 2026-08-07 3/150 2026-08-08 03:27 by 6vVgjDL4CnGu
[基金申请] 基金中了 +14 laoda193707 2026-08-06 14/700 2026-08-08 00:23 by 实验小白ha
[基金申请] 关于filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-07 22:55 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] 娱乐 +6 Tide man 2026-08-03 6/300 2026-08-07 22:40 by 铁帽子农民
[基金申请] 关于代码变化问题,想知道的进来 +9 且听虎啸 2026-08-07 12/600 2026-08-07 21:53 by 理想三旬2025
[基金申请] 固定端突然变了,今天 +6 archvillain 2026-08-06 10/500 2026-08-07 16:03 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] 听说今天filecode变了 +24 布布和一二 2026-08-06 47/2350 2026-08-07 16:02 by zhiyanjiang
[基金申请] filecode与中标关系的预测 +3 布布和一二 2026-08-07 3/150 2026-08-07 15:09 by gltch
[基金申请] filecode变化情况 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-07 22/1100 2026-08-07 14:45 by 且听虎啸
[基金申请] 大家散了吧,后缀研究没有意义,别浪费时间了,过好目前的每一天,不要焦虑 +5 Tide man 2026-08-06 7/350 2026-08-07 13:11 by 医学老男孩
[基金申请] 关于豆爷回答的JTJC与%2F数量 +4 yang182083 2026-08-06 6/300 2026-08-07 12:43 by 虫友是什么虫
[基金申请] filecode +8 布布和一二 2026-08-06 11/550 2026-08-06 20:41 by tangpu318
[基金申请] 影响面上的因素 +8 布布和一二 2026-08-05 11/550 2026-08-06 10:41 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 8月时间戳变的,举个手。玩一下,释放压力 +9 archvillain 2026-08-04 11/550 2026-08-05 20:06 by wlwhappy
[考博] 【2027博士申请】纳米药物递送方向 20+3 13586093586 2026-08-03 4/200 2026-08-05 09:59 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 有没有H口的?有收到消息的吗? +3 超级海虾 2026-08-04 3/150 2026-08-04 17:26 by 学教育滴
[基金申请] 纯娱乐,不喜欢勿喷 +7 Tide man 2026-08-04 10/500 2026-08-04 15:10 by loufangrui
[基金申请] 面上提前没消息,有中的吗 +14 archvillain 2026-08-02 18/900 2026-08-04 14:42 by archvillain
[基金申请] 什么时候能放榜呀? +3 Jacob678 2026-08-03 3/150 2026-08-03 16:14 by gltch
信息提示
请填处理意见