24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

雷雨加暴雨

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 126.8
帖子: 57
在线: 3.8小时
虫号: 20331382
注册: 2019-12-30
性别: MM

[交流] JBE初审被拒，请大家帮忙看下审稿人的意见已有6人参与

第一个审稿人：While this is a well-written paper, there are some fundamental concerns that I categorise under two major titles: theoretical and methodological.
第二个审稿人: This paper is interesting. However, below I have some specific comments that might help improve the paper.
第三个审稿人: The topic and the overall framework are interesting. The paper is well-organized and fairly easy to navigate. However, there are several issues that have severely undermined its contributions to the literature.
虽然拒稿是个很常见的事情，对于科研人来说但是还是有点伤心加失落啊。仔细研究了审稿人的意见，每个审稿人都提了六七个问题，但是总体评价似乎还算积极的吧？由于是第一次SCI，对于审稿人评语不是很明白，比如“well-written”“interesting”对一篇文章是哪种程度的评价？是礼貌用语吗？

发自小木虫IOS客户端

回复此楼