24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者xiaochoujiao将赠送您 10 个金币

xiaochoujiao

新虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 687.9
散金: 18
帖子: 272
在线: 27.5小时
虫号: 1483897
注册: 2011-11-09
专业: 计算机应用技术

[求助] SOS！求助，不知道如何理解审稿人的意见已有1人参与

Regarding the selected benchmark problems F1-18 , the author must evaluate the proposed algorithm on all CEC2017 benchmark problems on D=10,30,50 and 100. The number of runs is 51 for each problem in each dimension, the total function evaluations are 100000,300000,500000 and 1000000 for D=10,30,50,100. Please refer to the technical report

[1]N.H. Awad, M.Z. Ali, J.J. Liang, B.Y. Qu, P. N. Suganthan, “Problem Definitions and Evaluation Criteria for the CEC 2017 Special Session and Competition on Single Objective Real-Parameter Numerical Optimization,” Nanyang Technological University, Jordan University of Science and Technology and Zhengzhou University, Tech. Rep., 2016.

这个CEC2017里面有好多测试函数，我们已经做了18个，根据审稿人的意见是不是要求我们一定全做，但是这个工作量太大了。我的想法是基本测试函数全做，然后其他类型的测试函数再选一下做，可以吗？如果可以的话，做完之后提交审稿回复，该怎么表达呢？

回复此楼