|
[½»Á÷]
´óÐÞÍê¸øÁËСÐÞ£¬±à¼ÈöÔÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÎÊÌâ»ØÓ¦£¬µ«ÊÇûÓоßÌåµÄÒâ¼û£¬¸ÃÔõô°ì
ÇëÎÊ´ó¼Ò£¬´óÐÞÍê¸øÁËСÐÞ£¬±à¼ÈöÔÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÎÊÌâ»ØÓ¦£¬µ«ÊÇûÓоßÌåµÄÒâ¼û£¬¸ÃÔõô°ì£¬´ó¼ÒÓÐûÓÐÅöÉϹýÕâÖÖÇé¿ö£¬¼±µÈ£¬Íò·Ö¸Ðл
Associate Editor
Dear Authors,
your manuscript has been once again revised by two experts in this area of research and the recommendation is to proceed to Minor Revision.
One reviewer -an expert- is not totally satisfied with the revised version. So, to avoid Reject, provide sound reply to the technical concerns he/she is asking for and still remained with not a convincing response.
Reviewer(s) Comments:
Reviewer: 1
Comments to the Author
Dear Authors,
Thank you so much for very accurate responses to my comments. Although I may have some different opinions regarding some points, I believe you have performed significant improvements to the paper. Therefore, I think the recent version of the article is ready for publication.
Thank you again for the good work.
Best regards.
Reviewer: 2
Comments to the Author
No comments. |
|