24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2914  |  回复: 20
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者zhuzhanlong将赠送您 100 个金币

zhuzhanlong

新虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 这样的情况---拒稿后还能重投吗?请有经验的帮忙看看! 已有2人参与

这样的情况---拒稿后还能重投吗?请大家帮忙看看。
Ms. Ref. No.:  SIGPRO-D-19-00262R1
Title: Two-paths hybrid algorithm for segmenting image of unequal cluster sizes based on chaos optimization and improved fuzzy c-means
Signal Processing

Dear Dr. zhu,

Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that Reviewer #2 has some critical concerns about the correctness of some equations and is advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it.

For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below.

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work.

Yours sincerely,

Luís Ducla Soares, PhD
Handling Editor
Signal Processing

********************************************************





Reviewers' comments:


Reviewer #1: For most of the comments previously,the author did rethink many aspects of them and have made a response.
1.It has been made an appropriate deletion of section 2 ("Background works". It is more clear to see related works.
2.The author made a simple explanation on the difference among those four chaotic equations. The author also made further
explanations in the following part.
3.The author have re-created the parameter list in Table 3, and made a detailed explanation on it. In some extant, it is explained why those parameters were chosen.
4.After the author's explanation, the ground truth images of the NDT images are available to get now.
5.The word "Evolutionary computation" now is more suitable than "Artificial intelligence".

In general, the paper re-submitted is better than original version.



Reviewer #2: I'm glad to see that this manuscript has been improved extensively and majority of my concerns have been responded reasonably. However, I still have several major issues disclosed below:

Major comments:

1. The authors have showed the deduced process of formula (20), from which I find something wrong. I cannot get formula (16) according to my analysis when taking the partial derivative of L with respect to uij. Perhaps they made a confusion about subscripts i and j in uij and L. Try to use different subscripts rather than i and j, and re-deduce the minimization process of formula (15).

2. As mentioned above, their experimental results are no longer convincing. However, I still want to make some comments on results of syn1 and syn2. These two images are perhaps more suitable to test the robustness to noises of one algorithm.

Minor comments:

In Tab 4 and 5, maximum values of a merit should be written in special format (eg. bold type) to facilitate readers.


以上是编辑的信息,我全封不动地贴在这里了。
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

holypower

至尊木虫 (知名作家)


paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2019-06-08 10:35:01
已经拒了,没说让你重投,换个杂志吧!

发自小木虫IOS客户端
4楼2019-06-07 20:36:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

国际科学编辑

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)


【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
完全可以再好好修一次重投的

发自小木虫IOS客户端
5楼2019-06-07 20:41:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

呆萌大熊

新虫 (著名写手)


paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2019-06-08 10:35:11
按要求修改,重投可以的。我遇到过类似情况

发自小木虫Android客户端

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

7楼2019-06-07 20:43:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

沧海臻宥

新虫 (著名写手)


paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2019-06-08 10:35:56
引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by zhuzhanlong at 2019-06-07 20:43:23
在拒稿信中编辑确实没有提重投这事。我这是大修后的再审,显然第一个审稿人已经同意了。第二个审稿人也没有表现出拒绝的意思。所以我想试试,请问,你遇到过这样的情况吗?...

一般第二个审稿人的这种意见我在一审有遇到过,这种明显拒稿的意见一般都是你那方向的大牛。如果想试试,建议完全按照审稿人的意思改下,再说点好话还是有可能的,每个审稿人还是对科研工作者比较友善的

发自小木虫Android客户端
11楼2019-06-07 21:01:38
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

bobvan

至尊木虫 (文坛精英)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2019-06-08 10:36:05
“As mentioned above, their experimental results are no longer convincing”除非您能说明你的实验结果真实可信,否则没有必要重投
17楼2019-06-08 00:41:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

沧海臻宥

新虫 (著名写手)

对裁判提出的那块做重大修改后应该是可以重投的,祝福

发自小木虫Android客户端

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

2楼2019-06-07 20:33:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

gaofeiyizi

金虫 (职业作家)

3楼2019-06-07 20:34:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhuzhanlong

新虫 (小有名气)

送红花一朵
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by 沧海臻宥 at 2019-06-07 20:33:33
对裁判提出的那块做重大修改后应该是可以重投的,祝福

在拒稿信中编辑确实没有提重投这事。我这是大修后的再审,显然第一个审稿人已经同意了。第二个审稿人也没有表现出拒绝的意思。所以我想试试,请问,你遇到过这样的情况吗?
6楼2019-06-07 20:43:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zlu520

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

限制人

无完人!
8楼2019-06-07 20:49:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhuzhanlong

新虫 (小有名气)

送红花一朵
引用回帖:
7楼: Originally posted by 呆萌大熊 at 2019-06-07 20:43:46
按要求修改,重投可以的。我遇到过类似情况

你的情况是,编辑拒绝的信件也没有提重投这事吗?
9楼2019-06-07 20:50:42
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
本帖仅楼主可见
10楼2019-06-07 20:50:46
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 zhuzhanlong 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[考研] 320材料与化工,求调剂 +12 鹤遨予卿 2026-03-04 14/700 2026-03-10 22:37 by peike
[考研] 086000生物与医药319分求调剂 +4 Tolkien 2026-03-07 8/400 2026-03-10 21:34 by Tolkien
[考研] 求调剂材料专硕293 +6 段_(:з」∠)_ 2026-03-10 6/300 2026-03-10 18:22 by ms629
[考研] 一志愿天津大学,英一数二305分求调剂,四六级已过 +7 小小番的茄 2026-03-09 7/350 2026-03-10 16:48 by ztnimte
[考研] 一志愿东北大学080500,英一数二343分求调剂 +8 Seele_v5 2026-03-04 8/400 2026-03-10 14:51 by ruiyingmiao
[考研] 材料专硕调剂 +7 慕辰123 2026-03-05 10/500 2026-03-10 14:22 by peike
[考研] 293求调剂 +4 上班不着吉 2026-03-09 4/200 2026-03-09 22:43 by bingxueer79
[考研] 307求调剂 +3 辛仁豆腐 2026-03-08 5/250 2026-03-09 14:09 by macy2011
[考研] 中科大材料299求调剂 +10 DAIjiayo 2026-03-05 16/800 2026-03-09 10:45 by 斩魂滴兔子!
[考研] 材料调剂 +4 xxxcm 2026-03-08 7/350 2026-03-09 10:11 by EBSD
[考研] 化学工程求调剂 +12 化工人999 2026-03-04 12/600 2026-03-08 11:17 by 我的船我的海
[考研] 301求调剂 +5 一二LV 2026-03-07 5/250 2026-03-07 22:20 by 18137688336
[考研] 0703化学求调剂学校 +3 一志愿京区211 2026-03-04 3/150 2026-03-07 21:35 by yinhuanshun
[考研] 一志愿中石油,化学工程,301求调剂 +4 豚馒枳枳 2026-03-04 4/200 2026-03-06 22:15 by 星空星月
[考研] 材料与化工304求B区调剂 +4 邱gl 2026-03-06 4/200 2026-03-06 15:51 by 聪明的大松鼠
[考研] 085600,一志愿郑州大学,280分求调剂 +7 Wuqi725 2026-03-05 7/350 2026-03-06 08:12 by 杨杨杨紫
[考研] 328求调剂 +6 vuzhdkfjkx 2026-03-04 7/350 2026-03-05 23:28 by Leeding1356
[考研] 085602 293分求调剂 +3 SivanNano. 2026-03-05 3/150 2026-03-05 19:41 by caszguilin
[考研] 求调剂 +3 泡了个椒 2026-03-04 4/200 2026-03-05 14:37 by 泡了个椒
[考研] 295求调剂 +4 小赛不吃香菜 2026-03-04 4/200 2026-03-04 16:13 by sslc1985
信息提示
请填处理意见