| 查看: 2932 | 回复: 20 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者zhuzhanlong将赠送您 100 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
zhuzhanlong新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
这样的情况---拒稿后还能重投吗？请有经验的帮忙看看！ 已有2人参与
|
||
|
这样的情况---拒稿后还能重投吗？请大家帮忙看看。 Ms. Ref. No.: SIGPRO-D-19-00262R1 Title: Two-paths hybrid algorithm for segmenting image of unequal cluster sizes based on chaos optimization and improved fuzzy c-means Signal Processing Dear Dr. zhu, Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that Reviewer #2 has some critical concerns about the correctness of some equations and is advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely, Luís Ducla Soares, PhD Handling Editor Signal Processing ******************************************************** Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: For most of the comments previously,the author did rethink many aspects of them and have made a response. 1.It has been made an appropriate deletion of section 2 ("Background works"  . It is more clear to see related works.2.The author made a simple explanation on the difference among those four chaotic equations. The author also made further explanations in the following part. 3.The author have re-created the parameter list in Table 3, and made a detailed explanation on it. In some extant, it is explained why those parameters were chosen. 4.After the author's explanation, the ground truth images of the NDT images are available to get now. 5.The word "Evolutionary computation" now is more suitable than "Artificial intelligence". In general, the paper re-submitted is better than original version. Reviewer #2: I'm glad to see that this manuscript has been improved extensively and majority of my concerns have been responded reasonably. However, I still have several major issues disclosed below: Major comments: 1. The authors have showed the deduced process of formula (20), from which I find something wrong. I cannot get formula (16) according to my analysis when taking the partial derivative of L with respect to uij. Perhaps they made a confusion about subscripts i and j in uij and L. Try to use different subscripts rather than i and j, and re-deduce the minimization process of formula (15). 2. As mentioned above, their experimental results are no longer convincing. However, I still want to make some comments on results of syn1 and syn2. These two images are perhaps more suitable to test the robustness to noises of one algorithm. Minor comments: In Tab 4 and 5, maximum values of a merit should be written in special format (eg. bold type) to facilitate readers. 以上是编辑的信息，我全封不动地贴在这里了。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
308 085701 四六级已过求调剂
已经有14人回复
-
297求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
288求调剂（0703）一志愿东北大学
已经有8人回复
-
297一志愿上交085600求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
学硕285求调剂
已经有46人回复
-
一志愿哈工大材料324分求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
341求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
330求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
346分材料求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿华中农业大学071010，总分三百二,求调剂
已经有3人回复
★
paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2019-06-08 10:35:56
paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2019-06-08 10:35:56
|
一般第二个审稿人的这种意见我在一审有遇到过，这种明显拒稿的意见一般都是你那方向的大牛。如果想试试，建议完全按照审稿人的意思改下，再说点好话还是有可能的，每个审稿人还是对科研工作者比较友善的 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
11楼2019-06-07 21:01:38
zhuzhanlong2楼2019-06-07 20:33:33
gaofeiyizi
金虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 8920.4
- 散金: 6653
- 红花: 43
- 帖子: 4932
- 在线: 1955.1小时
- 虫号: 1371587
- 注册: 2011-08-18
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 力学中的基本问题和方法
3楼2019-06-07 20:34:23
holypower
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 19 (小学生)
- 金币: 22676.4
- 散金: 629
- 红花: 23
- 沙发: 2
- 帖子: 9934
- 在线: 463小时
- 虫号: 7060301
- 注册: 2017-08-14
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 临床与咨询心理学
4楼2019-06-07 20:36:54
