| 查看: 5060 | 回复: 16 | ||
[求助]
TCSVT 二审一般要多久啊 已有3人参与
|
||
|
Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The authors resubmitted this paper without a response letter. After carefully checking the content, it seems that the authors have addressed all of my concerns. Therefore, I recommend to accept this paper. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author The author has addressed my concerns in round-1 review. I think it is in good shape to publish. Reviewer: 3 Comments to the Author In this paper, the authors proposed an effective method for detecting double JPEG compression for the color image by using the conversion error, rounding error, and truncation error on the pixel in the spherical coordinate system. It is interesting. I have a few questions. 1. The most serious part is the organization of the paper, especially for the introduction section. It is highly suggested that the “State of the Art” should be split as one individual section, named as related work. Thus the introduction part can be more compact and easy for the reviewers to catch the point. 2. The authors proposed that they fully use three channels for map to spherical coordinates. These seems to be one straightforward extension. I am wondering the effectiveness and novelties. 3. The paper needs to be more carefully revised and reorganized. Some parts seem to be very redundant. For example, the color space conversion in Eq. (1) and (2) are the common knowledge, which should not be included in the paper. 4. The section II and the first part of section III seem to discuss the fore types of errors in color image JPEG compression, which seem to be overlappling. The authors are suggested to reorganize the paper to make it clearer. 还有这种意见修改后机会大吗？二审是三个审稿人都要审嘛？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
280求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
网上报道青年教师午睡中猝死、熬夜猝死的越来越多，主要哪些原因引起的？
已经有8人回复
-
面上可以超过30页吧？
已经有11人回复
-
版面费该交吗
已经有15人回复
-
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有18人回复
-
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？
已经有10人回复
-
什么是人一生最重要的？
已经有4人回复
lhqtcm
银虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 9 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 7636.1
- 散金: 806
- 红花: 18
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 1546
- 在线: 1515.5小时
- 虫号: 308821
- 注册: 2006-12-17
- 专业: 药剂学
2楼2019-05-29 10:08:33
editsprings 
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
- 应助: 794 (博后)
- 金币: 3322.5
- 散金: 3101
- 红花: 81
- 帖子: 1083
- 在线: 473.8小时
- 虫号: 4655759
- 注册: 2016-05-04
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
3楼2019-05-29 14:10:55
4楼2019-05-29 16:44:59
editsprings
捐助贵宾 (著名写手)
- 应助: 794 (博后)
- 金币: 3322.5
- 散金: 3101
- 红花: 81
- 帖子: 1083
- 在线: 473.8小时
- 虫号: 4655759
- 注册: 2016-05-04
- 专业: 无机纳米化学
5楼2019-05-29 17:09:02
国际科学编辑 
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 1532 (讲师)
- 金币: 3627.6
- 散金: 615
- 红花: 275
- 沙发: 3
- 帖子: 7972
- 在线: 146.9小时
- 虫号: 4407167
- 注册: 2016-02-16
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 病原微生物变异与耐药
6楼2019-05-29 17:11:25
lian900625
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 386.3
- 散金: 76
- 帖子: 80
- 在线: 68.6小时
- 虫号: 3102983
- 注册: 2014-03-31
- 专业: 电路与系统
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
paperhunter: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2019-05-29 22:13:37
曰小天: 金币+15, ★★★★★最佳答案 2019-05-31 16:31:24
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
paperhunter: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2019-05-29 22:13:37
曰小天: 金币+15, ★★★★★最佳答案 2019-05-31 16:31:24
| 应该给的是minor revision吧，不论是第几次审稿都会发给所有审稿人，但不会要求前两个审稿人回复（因为他们已经满意），第三个审稿人的意见返回AE就会给决定。根据我给TCSVT几次审稿的经验，返修一般会给审稿人2周时间。正常3周内应该出结果了。第三个审稿人的意见认真回复，尽量修改，难修改或者有异议的地方仔细说明，最好有明确的依据。最重要的是让AE觉得满意，感觉问题不大，一般会接收的。 |
7楼2019-05-29 17:28:12
8楼2019-05-31 00:54:08
9楼2019-05-31 00:55:44
10楼2019-05-31 00:56:32