| 查看: 4904 | 回复: 16 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
TCSVT 二审一般要多久啊已有3人参与
|
||
|
Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author The authors resubmitted this paper without a response letter. After carefully checking the content, it seems that the authors have addressed all of my concerns. Therefore, I recommend to accept this paper. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author The author has addressed my concerns in round-1 review. I think it is in good shape to publish. Reviewer: 3 Comments to the Author In this paper, the authors proposed an effective method for detecting double JPEG compression for the color image by using the conversion error, rounding error, and truncation error on the pixel in the spherical coordinate system. It is interesting. I have a few questions. 1. The most serious part is the organization of the paper, especially for the introduction section. It is highly suggested that the “State of the Art” should be split as one individual section, named as related work. Thus the introduction part can be more compact and easy for the reviewers to catch the point. 2. The authors proposed that they fully use three channels for map to spherical coordinates. These seems to be one straightforward extension. I am wondering the effectiveness and novelties. 3. The paper needs to be more carefully revised and reorganized. Some parts seem to be very redundant. For example, the color space conversion in Eq. (1) and (2) are the common knowledge, which should not be included in the paper. 4. The section II and the first part of section III seem to discuss the fore types of errors in color image JPEG compression, which seem to be overlappling. The authors are suggested to reorganize the paper to make it clearer. 还有这种意见修改后机会大吗？二审是三个审稿人都要审嘛？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
之前让一硕士生水了7个发明专利，现在这7个获批发明专利的维护费可从哪儿支出哈？
已经有9人回复
-
心脉受损
已经有6人回复
-
博士申请都是内定的吗？
已经有8人回复
-
博士读完未来一定会好吗
已经有32人回复
-
读博
已经有5人回复
-
投稿精细化工
已经有4人回复
-
高职单位投计算机相关的北核或SCI四区期刊推荐，求支招！
已经有4人回复
-
导师想让我从独立一作变成了共一第一
已经有9人回复
-
Springer期刊投稿求助
已经有4人回复
lian900625
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 386.3
- 散金: 76
- 帖子: 80
- 在线: 68.6小时
- 虫号: 3102983
- 注册: 2014-03-31
- 专业: 电路与系统
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
paperhunter: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2019-05-29 22:13:37
曰小天: 金币+15, ★★★★★最佳答案 2019-05-31 16:31:24
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
paperhunter: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2019-05-29 22:13:37
曰小天: 金币+15, ★★★★★最佳答案 2019-05-31 16:31:24
| 应该给的是minor revision吧，不论是第几次审稿都会发给所有审稿人，但不会要求前两个审稿人回复（因为他们已经满意），第三个审稿人的意见返回AE就会给决定。根据我给TCSVT几次审稿的经验，返修一般会给审稿人2周时间。正常3周内应该出结果了。第三个审稿人的意见认真回复，尽量修改，难修改或者有异议的地方仔细说明，最好有明确的依据。最重要的是让AE觉得满意，感觉问题不大，一般会接收的。 |
7楼2019-05-29 17:28:12
lian900625
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 386.3
- 散金: 76
- 帖子: 80
- 在线: 68.6小时
- 虫号: 3102983
- 注册: 2014-03-31
- 专业: 电路与系统
13楼2019-05-31 09:36:06
lian900625
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 386.3
- 散金: 76
- 帖子: 80
- 在线: 68.6小时
- 虫号: 3102983
- 注册: 2014-03-31
- 专业: 电路与系统
14楼2019-05-31 09:38:26
lian900625
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 2 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 386.3
- 散金: 76
- 帖子: 80
- 在线: 68.6小时
- 虫号: 3102983
- 注册: 2014-03-31
- 专业: 电路与系统
16楼2019-06-03 10:31:28