24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4908  |  回复: 16
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

曰小天

捐助贵宾 (小有名气)

[求助] TCSVT 二审一般要多久啊已有3人参与

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
The authors resubmitted this paper without a response letter. After carefully checking the content, it seems that the authors have addressed all of my concerns. Therefore, I recommend to accept this paper.

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
The author has addressed my concerns in round-1 review. I think it is in good shape to publish.

Reviewer: 3

Comments to the Author
In this paper, the authors proposed an effective method for detecting double JPEG compression for the color image by using the conversion error, rounding error, and truncation error on the pixel in the spherical coordinate system. It is interesting. I have a few questions.

1.        The most serious part is the organization of the paper, especially for the introduction section. It is highly suggested that the “State of the Art” should be split as one individual section, named as related work. Thus the introduction part can be more compact and easy for the reviewers to catch the point.
2.        The authors proposed that they fully use three channels for map to spherical coordinates. These seems to be one straightforward extension. I am wondering the effectiveness and novelties.
3.        The paper needs to be more carefully revised and reorganized. Some parts seem to be very redundant. For example, the color space conversion in Eq. (1) and (2) are the common knowledge, which should not be included in the paper.
4.        The section II and the first part of section III seem to discuss the fore types of errors in color image JPEG compression, which seem to be overlappling. The authors are suggested to reorganize the paper to make it clearer.
还有这种意见修改后机会大吗?二审是三个审稿人都要审嘛?
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

editsprings

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)


【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2019-05-29 22:13:20
曰小天: 金币+5, ★★★很有帮助 2019-05-31 16:31:36
录用机会感觉挺大的,好好回答第三个审稿人意见就好,具体做了哪些修改建议一条条写在回复信里(第一个审稿人也提到了),这样方便审稿人评阅
3楼2019-05-29 14:10:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 17 个回答

lhqtcm

银虫 (著名写手)


paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2019-05-29 22:13:10
二审最主要是第三个。好好回答,好好修改。

发自小木虫Android客户端
2楼2019-05-29 10:08:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

曰小天

捐助贵宾 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by editsprings at 2019-05-29 14:10:55
录用机会感觉挺大的,好好回答第三个审稿人意见就好,具体做了哪些修改建议一条条写在回复信里(第一个审稿人也提到了),这样方便审稿人评阅

第一个也回复了 第一次投稿这个期刊 reponse不知道要跟正文打成一个pdf 就回答这个就可以了吗?
4楼2019-05-29 16:44:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

editsprings

捐助贵宾 (著名写手)


引用回帖:
4楼: Originally posted by 曰小天 at 2019-05-29 16:44:59
第一个也回复了 第一次投稿这个期刊 reponse不知道要跟正文打成一个pdf 就回答这个就可以了吗?...

这个response letter回复信一般单独作为一个文档发送。我觉得只回答第3个审稿人意见就行。但可以感谢下前两个审稿人的辛苦工作
5楼2019-05-29 17:09:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
信息提示
请填处理意见