24小时热门版块排行榜

>论坛更新日志 (2769)
>虫友互识 (222)
>导师招生 (86)
>文献求助 (65)
>休闲灌水 (58)
>硕博家园 (49)
>考研 (29)
>论文投稿 (26)
>基金申请 (23)
>论文道贺祈福 (22)
>考博 (22)
>博后之家 (21)
>找工作 (16)
>公派出国 (16)
>教师之家 (15)
>健康生活 (13)

返回列表

【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 zghxmc 的 9 个金币，回帖就立即获得 1 个金币，每人有 1 次机会

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zghxmc

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 15.3
帖子: 34
在线: 48.5小时
虫号: 4110197

[交流] 各位虫友，帮忙把关一下下面的二审意见，看看编辑的总体倾向，谢谢

主编邮件内容：
Dear Dr.xxx,

The reviewers have commented on your above paper. They indicated that it is not acceptable for publication in its present form.
However, if you feel that you can suitably address the reviewers' comments (included below), I invite you to revise and resubmit your manuscript. You will find your submission record under the menu item, 'Submissions Needing Revision'.
Please carefully address the issues raised in the comments.

I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Yours sincerely,
XXXX
Editor-in-Chief

Sample Text
Reviewers' comments:

Area editor: The negative reviewer has declined the review invitation. I noticed that the revision addresses a large part of his/her comments. The positive reviewer requests positioning of the studied problem and the results obtained with the similar problems and with the results existing in the literature.

Reviewer #1: The authors have successfully answered all my concerns, with the exception of the second part of comment 1), which referred to citing a recent review on assembly scheduling problems in press in EJOR. I strongly suggest the authors to study this paper to connect their problem with other similar problems related to assembly with buffer limitations.

Reference:

(推荐的Paper)XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

回复此楼