| 查看: 4864 | 回复: 27 | |||
[交流]
论文 reject and resubmit （附上审稿意见）
|
|||
|
• Associate Editor Comments, if any, are listed below: 如题， 求大神分析一下这种情况下重投中稿的几率有多大；为何不是个大修？ Associate Editor: Comments to Author: (There are no comments. Please check to see if comments were included as a file attachment with this e-mail or as an attachment in your Author Center.) • Reviewer Comments, if any, are listed below: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author This paper formulates the computation resource allocation problem of public blockchain network from the viewpoint of coalition game theory under the mobile edge computing environment. A coalition formation game-based algorithm to maximize the system sum utility has been also proposed. Finally, the authors have performed simulation and comparison with only two schemes, i.e., noncooperative and random formation. The paper is well structured and the problem definition is quite satisfactory. More significantly, this paper addresses state-of-the-art topics like the blockchain, 5G networks, WBN, or edge computing. The proposed scheme is fairly related to the IoT field but the relation is not that much close as the only relation is the IDMs. The level of English writing is also satisfactory although some difficult words have been employed. In general, the paper will be of interest for this journal; nevertheless, the author should revise their paper by evaluating the following comments. 1- As said, the problem definition has been explained in a good fashion in the introduction and its specific section; however, I suggest adding a graphical representation to the introduction to better illustrate the occasion for a high level stand point. 2- The computation-consuming problem of the PoW consensus algorithm and the resource-limitation of IDMs should be clarified. In other words, the authors should exactly mention the hardware power of mobile device and the complexity of the aforementioned algorithm to justify this challenge. As you know, nowadays, the mobile devices take the advantage of 64-bit Octa-core or Deca-core ARM processors, so they are not limited as microcontrollers. The resource-limitation mostly used for the IoT nodes that uses ARM microcontrollers or other kinds of microcontrollers. 3- A table of notation or nomenclature will be so useful to follow the paper. For example, what ESP or RSU stands for? ESP is defined in the figure 1. More importantly, for the scheme itself. 4- I think more details can be added to Fig. 1. To better depict the system model. Further, I suggest using same notation throughout the paper. For example, in Fig. 1. IDM is more preferable than the sole mobile device. 5- One of the main concerns is that the authors have just compared their work with two of the related ones. 6- The second main concern is that they have not mentioned that on which hardware platform they performed the simulation. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author Give a better picture of what you have done with diagrams. Further, explain the real algorithms you tested against what. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有18人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可伽急
已经有5人回复
-
我就是申请一个面上项目而已，这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧？
已经有4人回复
-
国自然评审意见
已经有15人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有13人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有14人回复
-
系统查不到
已经有11人回复
5楼2019-01-18 09:57:39
22楼2019-01-18 15:41:03
4楼2019-01-18 09:54:45
6楼2019-01-18 10:00:37
9楼2019-01-18 10:26:06
11楼2019-01-18 10:35:20
12楼2019-01-18 10:55:53
17楼2019-01-18 12:20:31
18楼2019-01-18 12:38:56
19楼2019-01-18 12:43:13
23楼2019-01-18 16:12:28
25楼2019-01-19 23:47:41
27楼2019-01-22 14:02:24
28楼2020-10-12 14:31:51
简单回复
2019-01-18 09:52
回复
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
Sun_10833楼
2019-01-18 09:54
回复
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
1 发自小木虫Android客户端
泽林 冷Z7楼
2019-01-18 10:01
回复
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫IOS客户端
xmszkx8楼
2019-01-18 10:24
回复
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
ttvdr010楼
2019-01-18 10:34
回复
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
武先森森森13楼
2019-01-18 11:08
回复
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
， 发自小木虫IOS客户端
zhangtao57814楼
2019-01-18 11:24
回复
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
顶 发自小木虫IOS客户端
tzynew15楼
2019-01-18 11:25
回复
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
syhorchid16楼
2019-01-18 11:46
回复
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
懂音乐20楼
2019-01-18 12:54
回复
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
nono200921楼
2019-01-18 14:11
回复
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
·
youngen24楼
2019-01-18 16:16
回复
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
seesunburst26楼
2019-01-20 07:57
回复
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
投票:
10