24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4888  |  回复: 27
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

Uchihaa

新虫 (小有名气)


[交流] 论文 reject and resubmit (附上审稿意见)

•     Associate Editor Comments, if any, are listed below:

如题, 求大神分析一下这种情况下重投中稿的几率有多大;为何不是个大修?

Associate Editor:
Comments to Author:
(There are no comments. Please check to see if comments were included as a file attachment with this e-mail or as an attachment in your Author Center.)

•     Reviewer Comments, if any, are listed below:

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
This paper formulates the computation resource allocation problem of public blockchain network from the viewpoint of coalition game theory under the mobile edge computing environment. A coalition formation game-based algorithm to maximize the system sum utility has been also proposed. Finally, the authors have performed simulation and comparison with only two schemes, i.e., noncooperative and random formation. The paper is well structured and the problem definition is quite satisfactory. More significantly, this paper addresses state-of-the-art topics like the blockchain, 5G networks, WBN, or edge computing. The proposed scheme is fairly related to the IoT field but the relation is not that much close as the only relation is the IDMs. The level of English writing is also satisfactory although some difficult words have been employed. In general, the paper will be of interest for this journal; nevertheless, the author should revise their paper by evaluating the following comments.
1-     As said, the problem definition has been explained in a good fashion in the introduction and its specific section; however, I suggest adding a graphical representation to the introduction to better illustrate the occasion for a high level stand point.
2-     The computation-consuming problem of the PoW consensus algorithm and the resource-limitation of IDMs should be clarified. In other words, the authors should exactly mention the hardware power of mobile device and the complexity of the aforementioned algorithm to justify this challenge. As you know, nowadays, the mobile devices take the advantage of 64-bit Octa-core or Deca-core ARM processors, so they are not limited as microcontrollers. The resource-limitation mostly used for the IoT nodes that uses ARM microcontrollers or other kinds of microcontrollers.
3-     A table of notation or nomenclature will be so useful to follow the paper. For example, what ESP or RSU stands for? ESP is defined in the figure 1. More importantly, for the scheme itself.
4-     I think more details can be added to Fig. 1. To better depict the system model. Further, I suggest using same notation throughout the paper. For example, in Fig. 1. IDM is more preferable than the sole mobile device.
5-     One of the main concerns is that the authors have just compared their work with two of the related ones.
6-     The second main concern is that they have not mentioned that on which hardware platform they performed the simulation.


Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
Give a better picture of what you have done with diagrams. Further, explain the real algorithms you tested against what.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sheny925

铁虫 (著名写手)



Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
19楼2019-01-18 12:43:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 28 个回答

骆维斯基

新虫 (著名写手)



Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
4楼2019-01-18 09:54:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

luojiuyao

新虫 (职业作家)



Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
我们工作室最近也遇到了一个这样的,老师要求补实验然后重新投。

发自小木虫Android客户端
5楼2019-01-18 09:57:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Uchihaa

新虫 (小有名气)


引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by luojiuyao at 2019-01-18 09:57:39
我们工作室最近也遇到了一个这样的,老师要求补实验然后重新投。

最后结果怎么样了呢

发自小木虫Android客户端
6楼2019-01-18 10:00:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
Sun_10833楼
2019-01-18 09:54   回复  
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
1 发自小木虫Android客户端
2019-01-18 10:01   回复  
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫IOS客户端
xmszkx8楼
2019-01-18 10:24   回复  
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
ttvdr010楼
2019-01-18 10:34   回复  
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
2019-01-18 11:08   回复  
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫IOS客户端
2019-01-18 11:24   回复  
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫IOS客户端
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题 +6 瞬息宇宙 2026-09-01 12/600 2026-09-02 16:56 by tjutjulee
[基金申请] 要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够 +9 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 17/850 2026-09-02 14:04 by anjeeshine
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 10/500 2026-09-02 11:35 by 大不刘6
[基金申请] 学科评审组评审是指会评吗? +5 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 5/250 2026-09-02 10:13 by 雨冰共舞
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +5 myrtle 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-09-02 02:42 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 面上函评意见出来了,像什么等级? 20+4 Tsingking1 2026-08-27 17/850 2026-09-01 19:51 by 超级无敌华子
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +13 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 14/700 2026-09-01 11:06 by feng6531
[论文投稿] 小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写 5+3 l1963982152 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-09-01 09:04 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +7 gdd2018 2026-08-28 12/600 2026-09-01 08:32 by 尼古拉斯小虫
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +7 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 11/550 2026-08-31 23:16 by hittle2008
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +7 echo8914667 2026-08-30 8/400 2026-08-31 17:00 by yihongxu
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +7 349506619 2026-08-28 7/350 2026-08-31 13:39 by 冼亮淀粉酶
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
信息提示
请填处理意见