24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 4873  |  回复: 27
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

Uchihaa

新虫 (小有名气)


[交流] 论文 reject and resubmit (附上审稿意见)

•     Associate Editor Comments, if any, are listed below:

如题, 求大神分析一下这种情况下重投中稿的几率有多大;为何不是个大修?

Associate Editor:
Comments to Author:
(There are no comments. Please check to see if comments were included as a file attachment with this e-mail or as an attachment in your Author Center.)

•     Reviewer Comments, if any, are listed below:

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author
This paper formulates the computation resource allocation problem of public blockchain network from the viewpoint of coalition game theory under the mobile edge computing environment. A coalition formation game-based algorithm to maximize the system sum utility has been also proposed. Finally, the authors have performed simulation and comparison with only two schemes, i.e., noncooperative and random formation. The paper is well structured and the problem definition is quite satisfactory. More significantly, this paper addresses state-of-the-art topics like the blockchain, 5G networks, WBN, or edge computing. The proposed scheme is fairly related to the IoT field but the relation is not that much close as the only relation is the IDMs. The level of English writing is also satisfactory although some difficult words have been employed. In general, the paper will be of interest for this journal; nevertheless, the author should revise their paper by evaluating the following comments.
1-     As said, the problem definition has been explained in a good fashion in the introduction and its specific section; however, I suggest adding a graphical representation to the introduction to better illustrate the occasion for a high level stand point.
2-     The computation-consuming problem of the PoW consensus algorithm and the resource-limitation of IDMs should be clarified. In other words, the authors should exactly mention the hardware power of mobile device and the complexity of the aforementioned algorithm to justify this challenge. As you know, nowadays, the mobile devices take the advantage of 64-bit Octa-core or Deca-core ARM processors, so they are not limited as microcontrollers. The resource-limitation mostly used for the IoT nodes that uses ARM microcontrollers or other kinds of microcontrollers.
3-     A table of notation or nomenclature will be so useful to follow the paper. For example, what ESP or RSU stands for? ESP is defined in the figure 1. More importantly, for the scheme itself.
4-     I think more details can be added to Fig. 1. To better depict the system model. Further, I suggest using same notation throughout the paper. For example, in Fig. 1. IDM is more preferable than the sole mobile device.
5-     One of the main concerns is that the authors have just compared their work with two of the related ones.
6-     The second main concern is that they have not mentioned that on which hardware platform they performed the simulation.


Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
Give a better picture of what you have done with diagrams. Further, explain the real algorithms you tested against what.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

匿名

用户注销 (著名写手)



Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
本帖仅楼主可见
17楼2019-01-18 12:20:31
已阅   申请SEPI   回复此楼   编辑   查看我的主页
查看全部 28 个回答

骆维斯基

新虫 (著名写手)



Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
4楼2019-01-18 09:54:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

luojiuyao

新虫 (职业作家)



Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
我们工作室最近也遇到了一个这样的,老师要求补实验然后重新投。

发自小木虫Android客户端
5楼2019-01-18 09:57:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Uchihaa

新虫 (小有名气)


引用回帖:
5楼: Originally posted by luojiuyao at 2019-01-18 09:57:39
我们工作室最近也遇到了一个这样的,老师要求补实验然后重新投。

最后结果怎么样了呢

发自小木虫Android客户端
6楼2019-01-18 10:00:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
Sun_10833楼
2019-01-18 09:54   回复  
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
1 发自小木虫Android客户端
2019-01-18 10:01   回复  
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫IOS客户端
xmszkx8楼
2019-01-18 10:24   回复  
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
ttvdr010楼
2019-01-18 10:34   回复  
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫Android客户端
2019-01-18 11:08   回复  
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫IOS客户端
2019-01-18 11:24   回复  
Uchihaa(金币+1): 谢谢参与
发自小木虫IOS客户端
普通表情 高级回复 (可上传附件)
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 国社科又开始会评了,不知道这次命运如何 +6 雨打竹帘 2026-08-30 10/500 2026-08-31 09:29 by huixian257
[基金申请] 中青基了要发朋友圈吗? +6 349506619 2026-08-28 6/300 2026-08-31 08:43 by kingkocxr
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +12 eulota 2026-08-26 12/600 2026-08-31 08:42 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +6 echo8914667 2026-08-30 7/350 2026-08-31 08:41 by kingkocxr
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +10 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 19/950 2026-08-31 08:01 by blueearth171
[基金申请] 有没有仍没收到信息的 +7 德尚中行 2026-08-27 8/400 2026-08-30 20:52 by purplejack
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +6 gdd2018 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 08:58 by 超级无敌华子
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论 (金币+15) +15 晴天加油 2026-08-26 16/800 2026-08-29 18:28 by symmetry
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +12 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 13/650 2026-08-29 00:04 by superceng
[基金申请] 怎么查啊 +6 huang1991js 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-28 08:42 by winsaint
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +5 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 6/300 2026-08-27 16:00 by lfy8008
[基金申请] 看板上这么多中的,有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉…… +5 a089 2026-08-26 6/300 2026-08-27 14:05 by jonewore
[基金申请] 怎么看青基中了没有啊 +5 叶九微 2026-08-26 5/250 2026-08-27 10:35 by l_zh2008
[基金申请] 我不理解! +15 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 23/1150 2026-08-26 20:34 by zzuzxg
[基金申请] 出来了 +9 trojank 2026-08-26 9/450 2026-08-26 14:25 by 宝贝虫子
[基金申请] 国合可查了 +3 paperzjh 2026-08-26 3/150 2026-08-26 10:41 by LemmonTr
[基金申请] 今天务委会开完了,明天出结果吗 +19 angus9576 2026-08-25 23/1150 2026-08-26 10:03 by zp519
[基金申请] 国合现在查不到了吗? +10 chengyan1220 2026-08-24 20/1000 2026-08-26 08:57 by peasantsprig
[基金申请] 某些机构,以效率低为荣,以效率低作为存在感 +9 yuleib84 2026-08-25 10/500 2026-08-25 17:14 by alexon
信息提示
请填处理意见