24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1666  |  回复: 6
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wuzhenghai

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

[求助] The paper contains no experimental work and few comparisons ........怎么回复? 已有1人参与

其中一个审稿专家意见:The paper contains no experimental work and few comparisons of numerically generated data by the new dynamic model and existing data in free literature.
1.关于轴承动力学方面的。
2.两个审稿专家意见Consider after minor changes,其中一个提了实验的问题。
2.实验本实验室没条件,而且很难实施。
3.国外相关权威文献中没有这方面的研究,国内文献有研究,但期刊级别比较低而且结果都没有试验验证。
所以想请教一下虫友们,怎么回复?
1.        Relevance.
The manuscript presents a multi-body dynamic contact analysis of tribological phenomena inside a TRB with grease lubrication. The....... was used to simulate the role played by various factors (impact load, grease rheological proprieties, temperature) on ....... . The .........is presented as a source of vibration and therefore is carefully analyzed with relevant diagrams and validated with the existent experimentally results obtained by a neutral researcher.
The paper is appropriate for ........l as well as for a Journal in the field of Tribology.
2.        Originality.
In the first part (Introduction) the manuscript presents an up to date view of researches in the field of dynamics of TRB bearings and in the following parts an improved dynamic model containing the latest findings is, step by step, developed.
3.        Quality.
a.        The title and abstract describe adequately paper’s content.
b.        Significant related works are correctly referenced.
c.        The equations, most of them from the field of tribology, have been correctly derived.
d.        The figures are clearly drawn and effectively illustrate the data presented.
e.        The paper contains no experimental work and few comparisons of numerically generated data by the new dynamic model and existing data in free literature.
f.        The conclusions point out, shortly and qualitatively, the main findings of the paper.
回复此楼
收获不在这里。
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

osly

新虫 (正式写手)

4楼2018-09-23 21:35:26
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 7 个回答

osly

新虫 (正式写手)

2楼2018-09-23 12:53:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wuzhenghai

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by osly at 2018-09-23 12:53:27
楼主投的啥杂志啊?

shock and vibration
收获不在这里。
3楼2018-09-23 15:10:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
wuzhenghai: 金币+15, ★★★很有帮助 2018-09-24 20:18:29
wuzhenghai: 金币+10 2018-10-05 21:38:37
楼主在审稿回复中首先感谢审稿人的宝贵意见,随后说明目前没有实验条件,而且国内外权威文献没有相关的数据可供借鉴,最后表示将在以后的工作中完成研究。
咱也是有组织的人了...
5楼2018-09-23 22:20:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 我不理解! +19 Edward_pc 2026-08-26 27/1350 2026-09-02 12:08 by Ai19911123
[基金申请] 要骂人了,新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西,结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够 +9 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-31 16/800 2026-09-02 12:07 by Ai19911123
[基金申请] 基金系统什么内容也没有 30+4 winsaint 2026-08-27 10/500 2026-09-02 11:35 by 大不刘6
[基金申请] 科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题,而不是去凝练问题 +4 瞬息宇宙 2026-09-01 8/400 2026-09-02 10:35 by 瞬息宇宙
[文学芳草园] 梦想 +5 myrtle 2026-08-26 8/400 2026-09-02 02:42 by Leogzhya
[基金申请] 面上合作单位盖章 +6 ssyjh 2026-08-27 9/450 2026-09-01 20:01 by huagongfeihu
[基金申请] 面上函评意见出来了,像什么等级? 20+4 Tsingking1 2026-08-27 17/850 2026-09-01 19:51 by 超级无敌华子
[基金申请] 为什么资助数各大高校都创新高,自己申请怎么就这么难 +13 Kittylucky 2026-08-27 14/700 2026-09-01 11:06 by feng6531
[论文投稿] 小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写 5+3 l1963982152 2026-08-29 4/200 2026-09-01 09:04 by 北京莱茵编辑
[基金申请] 麻烦专家们看看评委们的意见(F口面上) +7 gdd2018 2026-08-28 12/600 2026-09-01 08:32 by 尼古拉斯小虫
[基金申请] 基金未中,这种答复是模板吗? +6 zhaosm1982 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-31 21:18 by qdxxmc
[基金申请] 面上意见出来了 +12 黄鸟于飞Chao 2026-08-29 23/1150 2026-08-31 18:57 by 黄鸟于飞Chao
[基金申请] 能否申诉? +7 echo8914667 2026-08-30 8/400 2026-08-31 17:00 by yihongxu
[基金申请] 29号明天会评吗 +4 笨笨唐 2026-08-28 4/200 2026-08-31 09:30 by huixian257
[基金申请] 基金不中,共勉 +12 eulota 2026-08-26 12/600 2026-08-31 08:42 by ZJTJZ
[基金申请] 为什么到现在没收到通知? +5 tannykie 2026-08-29 5/250 2026-08-30 21:05 by purplejack
[考博] 找导师 +6 yuanjiabao 2026-08-29 7/350 2026-08-30 14:40 by 生科新手
[基金申请] 我就是申请一个面上项目而已,这评审意见是按照杰青的条件评的吧? +6 gouxfjh 2026-08-28 11/550 2026-08-30 07:57 by gouxfjh
[基金申请] 国自然评审意见 +13 wangmingqi 2026-08-28 19/950 2026-08-29 10:22 by Poppy1104
[基金申请] 2026年叶企孙基金 +4 bud_bud 2026-08-27 7/350 2026-08-29 07:23 by foolishmani
信息提示
请填处理意见